Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27465199›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2016

The use of mosquito repellents at three sites in India with declining malaria transmission: surveys in the community and clinic.

Anna Maria van Eijk, Lalitha Ramanathapuram, Patrick L Sutton, Nandini Peddy, Sandhya Choubey, Stuti Mohanty, Aswin Asokan, Sangamithra Ravishankaran, G Sri Lakshmi Priya, Justin Amala Johnson and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Use of Household Insecticides against Mosquitoes in Dengue-Endemic Areas in Sri Lanka.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Prevention Efforts for Malaria.Current tropical medicine reports · 2018
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Anna Maria van EijkCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA. amvaneijk@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-1635-1289
Lalitha RamanathapuramCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Patrick L SuttonCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Nandini PeddyJigyansha, International Center of Excellence for Malaria Research, Sector 1, Raurkela, Odisha, India.
Sandhya ChoubeyJigyansha, International Center of Excellence for Malaria Research, Sector 1, Raurkela, Odisha, India.
Stuti MohantyJigyansha, International Center of Excellence for Malaria Research, Sector 1, Raurkela, Odisha, India.
Aswin AsokanNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Epidemiology Campus, Ayapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sangamithra RavishankaranNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Epidemiology Campus, Ayapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
G Sri Lakshmi PriyaNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Epidemiology Campus, Ayapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Justin Amala JohnsonNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Epidemiology Campus, Ayapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sangeetha VelayuthamNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Epidemiology Campus, Ayapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Deena KanagarajNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Epidemiology Campus, Ayapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ankita PatelNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Civil Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India.
Nisha DesaiNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Civil Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India.
Nikunj TandelNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Civil Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India.
Steven A SullivanCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
Samuel C WassmerLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Ranveer SinghNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Civil Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India.
K PradhanJigyansha, International Center of Excellence for Malaria Research, Sector 1, Raurkela, Odisha, India.
Jane M CarltonCenter for Genomics and Systems Biology, Department of Biology, New York University, New York, NY, 10003, USA.
H C SrivasatavaNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Civil Hospital, Nadiad, Gujarat, India.
Alex EapenNational Institute of Malaria Research Field Unit, Indian Council of Medical Research, National Institute of Epidemiology Campus, Ayapakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
S K SharmaNational Institute of Malaria Research, Indian Council of Medical Research, Dwarka Sector 8, New Delhi, India.
National Institute of Malaria Research · INIndian Council of Medical Research · INNew York University · USAlbany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences · USUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Using Next-Generation Genomics to Study Antimalarial Drug Resistance in IndiaU19AI089676 · NIAID · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI CARLTON, JANE M · 2010 to 2023
$22.6M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRepellents such as coils, vaporizers, mats and creams can be used to reduce the risk of malaria and other infectious diseases. Although evidence for their effectiveness is limited, they are advertised as providing an additional approach to mosquito control in combination with other strategies, e.g. insecticide-treated nets. We examined the use of repellents in India in an urban setting in Chennai (mainly Plasmodium vivax malaria), a peri-urban setting in Nadiad (both P. vivax and P. falciparum malaria), and a more rural setting in Raurkela (mainly P. falciparum malaria).

methodsThe use of repellents was examined at the household level during a census, and at the individual level in cross-sectional surveys and among patients visiting a clinic with fever or other symptoms. Factors associated with their use were examined in a multivariate analysis, and the association between malaria and the use of repellents was assessed among survey- and clinic participants.

resultsCharacteristics of participants differed by region, with more people of higher education present in Chennai. Use of repellents varied between 56-77 % at the household level and between 32-78 % at the individual level. Vaporizers were the main repellents used in Chennai, whereas coils were more common in Nadiad and Raurkela. In Chennai and Nadiad, vaporizers were more likely to be used in households with young male children. Vaporizer use was associated with higher socio-economic status (SES) in households in Chennai and Nadiad, whereas use of coils was greater in the lower SES strata. In Raurkela, there was a higher use of coils among the higher SES strata. Education was associated with the use of a repellent among survey participants in Chennai and clinic study participants in Chennai and Nadiad. Repellent use was associated with less malaria in the clinic study in Chennai and Raurkela, but not in the surveys, with the exception of the use of coils in Nadiad.

conclusionsRepellents are widely used in India. Their use is influenced by the level of education and SES. Information on effectiveness and guidance on choices may improve rational use.

Indexed as

Insect RepellentsMosquito ControlAdolescentAdultAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFamily CharacteristicsFemaleFeverHumansIndiaMalariaMalaria, FalciparumInsect RepellentsEducationMosquito controlPlasmodium falciparumPlasmodium vivaxRepellentsRuralSocio-economic statusUrban

Identifiers

PMID27465199
PMCPMC4963934
OpenAlexW2480197949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.