Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27465072›Full record

ArticleStem cells translational medicine2016

Translating Periosteum's Regenerative Power: Insights From Quantitative Analysis of Tissue Genesis With a Periosteum Substitute Implant.

Shannon R Moore, Céline Heu, Nicole Y C Yu, Renee M Whan, Ulf R Knothe, Stefan Milz, Melissa L Knothe Tate

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells translational medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Periosteum and fascia lata: Are they so different?Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Origin of Reparative Stem Cells in Fracture Healing.Current osteoporosis reports · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Shannon R MooreDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Céline HeuGraduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicole Y C YuGraduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Renee M WhanBiomedical Imaging Facility, Mark Wainwright Analytical Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ulf R KnotheDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Stefan MilzAnatomische Anstalt, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Melissa L Knothe TateGraduate School of Biomedical Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia m.knothetate@unsw.edu.au.
UNSW Sydney · AUCase Western Reserve University · USCleveland Clinic · USLudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

: An abundance of surgical studies during the past 2 centuries provide empirical evidence of periosteum's regenerative power for reconstructing tissues as diverse as trachea and bone. This study aimed to develop quantitative, efficacy-based measures, thereby providing translational guidelines for the use of periosteum to harness the body's own healing potential and generate target tissues. The current study quantitatively and qualitatively demonstrated tissue generation modulated by a periosteum substitute membrane that replicates the structural constituents of native periosteum (elastin, collagen, progenitor cells) and its barrier, extracellular, and cellular properties. It shows the potentiation of the periosteum's regenerative capacity through the progenitor cells that inhabit the tissue, biological factors intrinsic to the extracellular matrix of periosteum, and mechanobiological factors related to implant design and implementation. In contrast to the direct intramembranous bone generated in defects surrounded by patent periosteum in situ, tissue generation in bone defects bounded by the periosteum substitute implant occurred primarily via endochondral mechanisms whereby cartilage was first generated and then converted to bone. In addition, in defects treated with the periosteum substitute, tissue generation was highest along the major centroidal axis, which is most resistant to prevailing bending loads. Taken together, these data indicate the possibility of designing modular periosteum substitute implants that can be tuned for vectorial and spatiotemporal delivery of biological agents and facilitation of target tissue genesis for diverse surgical scenarios and regenerative medicine approaches. It also underscores the potential to develop physical therapy protocols to maximize tissue genesis via the implant's mechanoactive properties. SIGNIFICANCE: In the past 2 centuries, the periosteum, a niche for stem cells and super-smart biological material, has been used empirically in surgery to repair tissues as diverse as trachea and bone. In the past 25 years, the number of articles indexed in PubMed for the keywords "periosteum and tissue engineering" and "periosteum and regenerative medicine" has burgeoned. Yet the biggest limitation to the prescriptive use of periosteum is lack of easy access, giving impetus to the development of periosteum substitutes. Recent studies have opened up the possibility to bank periosteal tissues (e.g., from the femoral neck during routine resection for implantation of hip replacements). This study used an interdisciplinary, quantitative approach to assess tissue genesis in modular periosteum substitute implants, with the aim to provide translational strategies for regenerative medicine and tissue engineering.

Indexed as

Bone SubstitutesProstheses and ImplantsAnimalsBone RegenerationCollagenFluorescent DyesOsteogenesisPeriosteumSheepTissue EngineeringX-Ray MicrotomographyBone SubstitutesCollagenFluorescent DyesMesenchymal stem cellPeriosteumRegenerative medicineTissue engineeringTissue genesis

Identifiers

PMID27465072
PMCPMC5189650
OpenAlexW2507044375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.