ArticleMolecular bioSystems2016
Regulation of highly homologous major urinary proteins in house mice quantified with label-free proteomic methods.
Article in Molecular bioSystems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Variation in mouse chemical signals is genetically controlled and environmentally modulated.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Nephrotoxicity evaluation and proteomic analysis in kidneys of rats exposed to thioacetamide.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Regulation of Sexually Dimorphic Expression of Major Urinary Proteins.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- Pheromones that correlate with reproductive success in competitive conditions.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Biological Roles of Lipocalins in Chemical Communication, Reproduction, and Regulation of Microbiota.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
- Update on the human and mouse lipocalin (LCN) gene family, including evidence the mouse Mup cluster is result of an "evolutionary bloom".Human genomics · 2019Review
- Regulation of volatile and non-volatile pheromone attractants depends upon male social status.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Individual odour signatures that mice learn are shaped by involatile major urinary proteins (MUPs).BMC biology · 2018Article
- Transcriptomic and Proteomic Profiling Revealed High Proportions of Odorant Binding and Antimicrobial Defense Proteins in Olfactory Tissues of the House Mouse.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Article
- Two predominant MUPs, OBP3 and MUP13, are male pheromones in rats.Frontiers in zoology · 2018Article
- Differential regulation of vaginal lipocalins (OBP, MUP) during the estrous cycle of the house mouse.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Pru p 3, a marker allergen for lipid transfer protein sensitization also in Central Europe.Allergy · 2017Article
- Molecular heterogeneity in major urinary proteins of Mus musculus subspecies: potential candidates involved in speciation.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- On the tear proteome of the house mouse (PeerJ · 2017Article
- Diversity of major urinary proteins (MUPs) in wild house mice.Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Major urinary proteins (MUPs) are highly homologous proteoforms that function in binding, transporting and releasing pheromones in house mice. The main analytical challenge for studying variation in MUPs, even for state-of-the-art proteomics techniques, is their high degree of amino acid sequence homology. In this study we used unique peptides for proteoform-specific identification. We applied different search engines (ProteinPilot™vs. PEAKS®) and protein databases (MUP database vs. SwissProt + unreviewed MUPs), and found that proteoform identification is influenced by addressing background proteins (unregulated urinary proteins, non-MUPs) during the database search. High resolution Q-TOF mass spectrometry was used to identify and precisely quantify the regulation of MUP proteoforms in male mice that were reared in standard housing and then transferred to semi-natural enclosures (within-subject design). By using a designated MUP database we were able to distinguish 19 MUP proteoforms, with A2CEK6 (a Mup11 gene product) being the most abundant based on spectral intensities. We compared three different quantification strategies based on MS1- (from IDA and SWATH™ spectra) and MS2 (SWATH™) data, and the results of these methods were correlated. Furthermore, three data normalization methods were compared and we found that increased statistical significance of fold-changes can be achieved by normalization based on urinary protein concentrations. We show that male mice living in semi-natural enclosures significantly up-regulated some but not all MUPs (differential regulation), e.g., A2ANT6, a Mup6 gene product, was upregulated between 9-fold (MS1) and 13-fold (MS2) using the designated MUP database. Finally, we show that 85 ± 7% of total MS intensity can be attributed to MUP-derived peptides, which supports the assumption that MUPs are the primary proteins in mouse urine. Our results provide new tools for assessing qualitative and quantitative variation of MUPs and suggest that male mice regulate the expression of specific MUP proteoforms, depending upon social conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.