Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27464740›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie2016

[Kidney transplantation in old age].

C Kurschat

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The emerging role of cellular senescence in renal diseases.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

C KurschatKlinik II für Innere Medizin, Nephrologie, Rheumatologie, Diabetologie und Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland. christine.kurschat@uk-koeln.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Older patients clearly benefit from a kidney transplantation despite multiple comorbidities and complications, particularly with respect to life expectancy. Older patients remaining on dialysis on average die earlier compared to patients who underwent a kidney transplantation. In addition, patients experience a significant increase in the quality of life after renal transplantation. However, every patient has to be thoroughly evaluated to assess the individual benefits of a renal transplantation. Geriatric tools are particularly helpful to evaluate the suitability of older individuals. In 1999 the Eurotransplant senior program (ESP or "old for old") was initiated, aiming at shortening waiting time and cold ischemia time for patients on the waiting list. In this program, kidneys of donors aged 65 years and older are locally allocated to recipients also of 65 years and older. The results in ESP are promising, to the effect that this program helps older patients to receive a kidney transplant earlier than by the normal procedure; however, a better alternative to the ESP program is living donor transplantation, provided that a suitable donor is available. There is no age limit for the evaluation of potential donors. Compared to deceased donor kidney transplantation a living donor kidney will most likely function with a higher spontaneous rate and for a longer period of time and therefore provides a clear advantage for older recipients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDonor SelectionEuropeEvidence-Based MedicineFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationMalePatient SelectionTreatment OutcomeAgingEurotransplant senior programRenal replacement therapySurvivalTransplant function

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.