Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27464648›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2016

The Bariatric Patient in the Intensive Care Unit: Pitfalls and Management.

Carlos E Pompilio, Paolo Pelosi, Melina G Castro

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. "Obesity Paradox" in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Among Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Carlos E PompilioThe Center for Diabetes and Obesity, Oswaldo Cruz Hospital, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. carlos.pompilio@gmail.com.
Paolo PelosiIRCCS San Martino IST, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Melina G CastroHospital Mário Covas and Hospital de Ensino Anchieta da Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Grupo de Assistência Nutricional Enteral e Parenteral (GANEP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRHospital Estadual Mário Covas · BRUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing number of bariatric/metabolic operations as important alternatives for the treatment of obesity and type 2 diabetes brought several concerns about the intensive care of patients undergoing those procedures. Intensive Care Unit admission criteria are needed in order to better allocate resources and avoid unnecessary interventions. Furthermore, well-established protocols, helpful in many clinical situations, are not directly applicable to obese patients. Indeed, difficult airway management, mechanical ventilation, fluid therapy protocols, prophylaxis, and treatment of venous thromboembolic events have unique aspects that should be taken into consideration. Finally, new data related to planning nutrition therapy of the critically obese have been highlighted and deserve consideration. In this review, we provide an outline of recent studies related to those important aspects of the care of the bariatric/metabolic patients in critical conditions.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryCritical CareHumansObesityBariatricCritical obeseDifficult airwayICUMechanical ventilationMetabolic surgeryMonitoringNutritionVTE

Identifiers

PMID27464648
OpenAlexW2492990959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.