Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27464567›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016

Women's perceptions of antenatal care: are we following guideline recommended care?

Amy Waller, Jamie Bryant, Emilie Cameron, Mohamed Galal, Juliana Quay, Rob Sanson-Fisher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amy WallerPriority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle & Hunter Medical Research Institute, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia. amy.waller@newcastle.edu.au.
Jamie BryantPriority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle & Hunter Medical Research Institute, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Emilie CameronPriority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle & Hunter Medical Research Institute, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.
Mohamed GalalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Juliana QuayDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Rob Sanson-FisherPriority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, University of Newcastle & Hunter Medical Research Institute, HMRI Building, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetection and management of antenatal risk factors is critical for improved maternal and infant outcomes. This study describes the proportion of pregnant women who self-reported being screened for and offered advice to manage antenatal risk factors in line with antenatal care recommendations; and the characteristics associated with rates of screening.

methodsA survey was undertaken with 223 (64 % of eligible) pregnant women recruited from an outpatient obstetrics clinic at a public hospital. Participants self-reported whether they were: (i) screened for 23 guideline-recommended risk factors during their antenatal visit; (ii) offered assistance to manage identified risk factor(s); and (iii) received assistance that was of benefit. Association between rate of screening and participant characteristics was examined using multivariate quantile regression.

resultsOverall, 23 % of women reported that they were asked about every risk factor. Weight gain (48 %), diet (60 %) and oral health (31 %) were least frequently screened risk factors. The number of women who reported they were offered advice to manage identified risks and the value of that advice was perceived by women as suboptimal. Those women receiving shared care between a midwife and general practitioner, of Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander descent, and without private health insurance reported being screened for a greater number of risk factors.

conclusionsPregnant women report suboptimal rates of screening and management of antenatal risk factors. Initiatives to improve consistency in detection of antenatal risk factors and the application of appropriate interventions to manage those risk factors that are detected are required.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdultFemaleHumansMultivariate AnalysisPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnant PeoplePrenatal CarePrenatal DiagnosisRegression AnalysisRisk FactorsYoung AdultAntenatalGuidelinesImplementationPregnancyScreening

Identifiers

PMID27464567
PMCPMC4963960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.