ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2016
Wild cricket social networks show stability across generations.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chains of Commerce: A Comprehensive Review of Animal Welfare Impacts in the International Wildlife Trade.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Neighbourhood benthic configuration reveals hidden co-occurrence social diversity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Individualized social niches in animals: Theoretical clarifications and processes of niche change.Bioscience · 2024Review
- Simulated poaching affects global connectivity and efficiency in social networks of African savanna elephants-An exemplar of how human disturbance impacts group-living species.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Using Flies to Understand Social Networks.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021Review
- Long-term repeatability in social behaviour suggests stable social phenotypes in wild chimpanzees.Royal Society open science · 2020Article
- Insights from the study of complex systems for the ecology and evolution of animal populations.Current zoology · 2020Article
- Considering appropriate replication in the design of animal social network studies.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Editorial: Social networks analyses in primates, a multilevel perspective.Primates; journal of primatology · 2019Article
- Mechanisms of network evolution: a focus on socioecological factors, intermediary mechanisms, and selection pressures.Primates; journal of primatology · 2019Review
- Slower senescence in a wild insect population in years with a more female-biased sex ratio.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Article
- Testing the effect of early-life reproductive effort on age-related decline in a wild insect.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2019Article
- Comparing individual and population measures of senescence across 10 years in a wild insect population.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2019Article
- Analysing animal social network dynamics: the potential of stochastic actor-oriented models.The Journal of animal ecology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA central part of an animal's environment is its interactions with conspecifics. There has been growing interest in the potential to capture these interactions in the form of a social network. Such networks can then be used to examine how relationships among individuals affect ecological and evolutionary processes. However, in the context of selection and evolution, the utility of this approach relies on social network structures persisting across generations. This is an assumption that has been difficult to test because networks spanning multiple generations have not been available. We constructed social networks for six annual generations over a period of eight years for a wild population of the cricket Gryllus campestris.
resultsThrough the use of exponential random graph models (ERGMs), we found that the networks in any given year were able to predict the structure of networks in other years for some network characteristics. The capacity of a network model of any given year to predict the networks of other years did not depend on how far apart those other years were in time. Instead, the capacity of a network model to predict the structure of a network in another year depended on the similarity in population size between those years.
conclusionsOur results indicate that cricket social network structure resists the turnover of individuals and is stable across generations. This would allow evolutionary processes that rely on network structure to take place. The influence of network size may indicate that scaling up findings on social behaviour from small populations to larger ones will be difficult. Our study also illustrates the utility of ERGMs for comparing networks, a task for which an effective approach has been elusive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.