Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27464504›Full record

ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2016

Wild cricket social networks show stability across generations.

David N Fisher, Rolando Rodríguez-Muñoz, Tom Tregenza

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
13.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Neighbourhood benthic configuration reveals hidden co-occurrence social diversity.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Using Flies to Understand Social Networks.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David N FisherCentre for Ecology and Conservation, Penryn Campus, University of Exeter, Penryn, TR109FE, Cornwall, UK.
Rolando Rodríguez-MuñozCentre for Ecology and Conservation, Penryn Campus, University of Exeter, Penryn, TR109FE, Cornwall, UK.
Tom TregenzaCentre for Ecology and Conservation, Penryn Campus, University of Exeter, Penryn, TR109FE, Cornwall, UK. t.tregenza@exeter.ac.uk.
University of Exeter · GBUniversity of Guelph · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA central part of an animal's environment is its interactions with conspecifics. There has been growing interest in the potential to capture these interactions in the form of a social network. Such networks can then be used to examine how relationships among individuals affect ecological and evolutionary processes. However, in the context of selection and evolution, the utility of this approach relies on social network structures persisting across generations. This is an assumption that has been difficult to test because networks spanning multiple generations have not been available. We constructed social networks for six annual generations over a period of eight years for a wild population of the cricket Gryllus campestris.

resultsThrough the use of exponential random graph models (ERGMs), we found that the networks in any given year were able to predict the structure of networks in other years for some network characteristics. The capacity of a network model of any given year to predict the networks of other years did not depend on how far apart those other years were in time. Instead, the capacity of a network model to predict the structure of a network in another year depended on the similarity in population size between those years.

conclusionsOur results indicate that cricket social network structure resists the turnover of individuals and is stable across generations. This would allow evolutionary processes that rely on network structure to take place. The influence of network size may indicate that scaling up findings on social behaviour from small populations to larger ones will be difficult. Our study also illustrates the utility of ERGMs for comparing networks, a task for which an effective approach has been elusive.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological EvolutionFemaleGryllidaeMaleSocial BehaviorSpainExponential random graph modelsGryllusNetwork comparisonPopulation structure

Identifiers

PMID27464504
PMCPMC4964091
OpenAlexW2490812052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.