Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27464310›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2016

Incorporating truncating variants in PALB2, CHEK2, and ATM into the BOADICEA breast cancer risk model.

Andrew J Lee, Alex P Cunningham, Marc Tischkowitz, Jacques Simard, Paul D Pharoah, Douglas F Easton, Antonis C Antoniou

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Potential of polygenic risk scores for improving population estimates of women's breast cancer genetic risks.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew J LeeDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, The University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0677-0252
Alex P CunninghamDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, The University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK.
Marc TischkowitzDepartment of Medical Genetics and National Institute for Health Research, Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, The University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jacques SimardCanada Research Chair in Oncogenetics, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Paul D PharoahDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, The University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8494-732X
Douglas F EastonDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, The University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK.
Antonis C AntoniouDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, The University of Cambridge, Strangeways Research Laboratory, Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec · CA

Funding

Cancer Research UK 10118Cancer Research UK 10119Cancer Research UK 10124Cancer Research UK 11174Cancer Research UK 16561Cancer Research UK A11174
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe proliferation of gene panel testing precipitates the need for a breast cancer (BC) risk model that incorporates the effects of mutations in several genes and family history (FH). We extended the BOADICEA model to incorporate the effects of truncating variants in PALB2, CHEK2, and ATM.

methodsThe BC incidence was modeled via the explicit effects of truncating variants in BRCA1/2, PALB2, CHEK2, and ATM and other unobserved genetic effects using segregation analysis methods.

resultsThe predicted average BC risk by age 80 for an ATM mutation carrier is 28%, 30% for CHEK2, 50% for PALB2, and 74% for BRCA1 and BRCA2. However, the BC risks are predicted to increase with FH burden. In families with mutations, predicted risks for mutation-negative members depend on both FH and the specific mutation. The reduction in BC risk after negative predictive testing is greatest when a BRCA1 mutation is identified in the family, but for women whose relatives carry a CHEK2 or ATM mutation, the risks decrease slightly.

conclusionsThe model may be a valuable tool for counseling women who have undergone gene panel testing for providing consistent risks and harmonizing their clinical management. A Web application can be used to obtain BC risks in clinical practice (http://ccge.medschl.cam.ac.uk/boadicea/).Genet Med 18 12, 1190-1198.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsCheckpoint Kinase 2Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group N ProteinFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingHumansMiddle AgedMutationAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATM protein, humanBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanCheckpoint Kinase 2CHEK2 protein, humanFanconi Anemia Complementation Group N ProteinNuclear ProteinsPALB2 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID27464310
PMCPMC5086091
OpenAlexW2336112201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.