ArticleAnnals of neurology2016
Long-term evolution of multiple sclerosis disability in the treatment era.
Article in Annals of neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 193 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
193 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 433 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Prevalence of Cognitive Impairment in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Neuropsychology review · 2025Pooled it
- Dietary interventions for multiple sclerosis-related outcomes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Real-world evidence of ocrelizumab-treated relapsing multiple sclerosis cohort shows changes in progression independent of relapse activity mirroring phase 3 trials.Scientific reports · 2023Trial
- Efficacy and safety of ofatumumab in recently diagnosed, treatment-naive patients with multiple sclerosis: Results from ASCLEPIOS I and II.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2022Trial
- Disability improvement as a clinically relevant outcome in clinical trials of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2021Trial
- Siponimod: Disentangling disability and relapses in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Evaluation of no evidence of progression or active disease (NEPAD) in patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis in the ORATORIO trial.Annals of neurology · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Evaluating the neurofilament light chain-derived gap between biological and chronological age in multiple sclerosis and controls.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Inpatient care for people with multiple sclerosis - a secondary data analysis in Germany between 2019 and 2024.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
- Eyes closed single-leg stance test detects subtle sensorimotor decline in early multiple sclerosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cognition in multiple sclerosis within the modern diagnostic and treatment era.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Development of a Diagnostic Autoantibody Assay to a Consensus Motif for the Risk Prediction of Epstein-Barr Virus-Related Multiple Sclerosis.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2026Article
- The role of age in choosing high-efficacy treatment for multiple sclerosis: an Austrian MS Database study.Journal of neurology · 2026Article
- CAR T cell therapy in autoantibody-mediated neurological disorders: a promising strategy.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2026Review
- Dual-Targeting miR-219 and miR-146a in Multiple Sclerosis: Bridging Myelin Repair and Neuroinflammation for Novel Therapeutic Insights.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2026Review
- Smoking accelerates immunosenescence in multiple sclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Reduced peripheral serotonin levels in women with multiple sclerosis: associations with underweight status, treatment duration, and use of interferon beta 1a.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2026Article
- Disability profiles in progressive multiple sclerosis reflect pathology distribution, independent of clinical phenotype.Brain communications · 2026Article
133 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo characterize the accrual of long-term disability in a cohort of actively treated multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and to assess whether clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data used in clinical trials have long-term prognostic value.
methodsThis is a prospective study of 517 actively managed MS patients enrolled at a single center.
resultsMore than 91% of patients were retained, with data ascertained up to 10 years after the baseline visit. At this last assessment, neurologic disability as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was stable or improved compared to baseline in 41% of patients. Subjects with no evidence of disease activity (NEDA) by clinical and MRI criteria during the first 2 years had long-term outcomes that were no different from those of the cohort as a whole. 25-OH vitamin D serum levels were inversely associated with short-term MS disease activity; however, these levels had no association with long-term disability. At a median time of 16.8 years after disease onset, 10.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.2-14%) of patients reached an EDSS ≥ 6, and 18.1% (95% CI = 13.5-22.5%) evolved from relapsing MS to secondary progressive MS (SPMS).
interpretationRates of worsening and evolution to SPMS were substantially lower when compared to earlier natural history studies. Notably, the NEDA 2-year endpoint was not a predictor of long-term stability. Finally, the data call into question the utility of annual MRI assessments as a treat-to-target approach for MS care. Ann Neurol 2016;80:499-510.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.