ArticleIntegrated environmental assessment and management2017
Ecosystem services in risk assessment and management.
Article in Integrated environmental assessment and management, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing soil-health- and species-based sensitivity distributions for metal risk assessment in Tianjin soils.iScience · 2026Article
- The EPA Ecosystem Services Tool Selection Portal.Sustainability · 2024Article
- Synthesis of Two Decades of US EPA's Ecosystem Services Research to Inform Environmental, Community, and Sustainability Decision Making.Sustainability · 2021Article
- Evolving Science and Practice of Risk Assessment.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2021Article
- A review of measurements of air-surface exchange of reactive nitrogen in natural ecosystems across North America.The Science of the total environment · 2020Article
- Toward the improvement of total nitrogen deposition budgets in the United States.The Science of the total environment · 2019Article
- Applying ecosystem services for pre-market environmental risk assessments of regulated stressors.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2019Article
- Ecosystem services deserve better than "dirty paper".Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2017Article
- Assessing and managing multiple risks in a changing world-The Roskilde recommendations.Environmental toxicology and chemistry · 2017Article
- Using ecological production functions to link ecological processes to ecosystem services.Integrated environmental assessment and management · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ecosystem services (ES) concept holds much promise for environmental decision making. Even so, the concept has yet to gain full traction in the decisions and policies of environmental agencies in the United States, Europe, and elsewhere. In this paper we examine the opportunities for and implications of including ES in risk assessments and the risk management decisions that they inform. We assert that use of ES will: 1) lead to more comprehensive environmental protection; 2) help to articulate the benefits of environmental decisions, policies, and actions; 3) better inform the derivation of environmental quality standards; 4) enable integration of human health and ecological risk assessment; and 5) facilitate horizontal integration of policies, regulations, and programs. We provide the technical basis and supporting rationale for each assertion, relying on examples taken from experiences in the United States and European Union. Specific recommendations are offered for use of ES in risk assessment and risk management, and issues and challenges to advancing use of ES are described together with some of the science needed to improve the value of the ES concept to environmental protection. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:62-73. © 2016 SETAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.