Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27462371›Full record

ReviewBioData mining2016

Representing and querying disease networks using graph databases.

Artem Lysenko, Irina A Roznovăţ, Mansoor Saqi, Alexander Mazein, Christopher J Rawlings, Charles Auffray

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioData mining, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. An overview of graph databases and their applications in the biomedical domain.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021
    Article
  15. BioDWH2: an automated graph-based data warehouse and mapping tool.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Applying graph database technology for analyzing perturbed co-expression networks in cancer.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Artem Lysenko *Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, West Common, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ UK.
Irina A Roznovăţ *European Institute for Systems Biology and Medicine (EISBM), CIRI UMR CNRS 5308, CNRS-ENS-UCBL-INSERM, Lyon, France.
Mansoor Saqi *European Institute for Systems Biology and Medicine (EISBM), CIRI UMR CNRS 5308, CNRS-ENS-UCBL-INSERM, Lyon, France.
Alexander MazeinEuropean Institute for Systems Biology and Medicine (EISBM), CIRI UMR CNRS 5308, CNRS-ENS-UCBL-INSERM, Lyon, France.
Christopher J RawlingsRothamsted Research, Harpenden, West Common, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ UK.
Charles AuffrayEuropean Institute for Systems Biology and Medicine (EISBM), CIRI UMR CNRS 5308, CNRS-ENS-UCBL-INSERM, Lyon, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSystems biology experiments generate large volumes of data of multiple modalities and this information presents a challenge for integration due to a mix of complexity together with rich semantics. Here, we describe how graph databases provide a powerful framework for storage, querying and envisioning of biological data.

resultsWe show how graph databases are well suited for the representation of biological information, which is typically highly connected, semi-structured and unpredictable. We outline an application case that uses the Neo4j graph database for building and querying a prototype network to provide biological context to asthma related genes.

conclusionsOur study suggests that graph databases provide a flexible solution for the integration of multiple types of biological data and facilitate exploratory data mining to support hypothesis generation.

Indexed as

Computational approachDisease management platformGraph databaseNeo4j graphProtein-centric frameworkSystems medicine

Identifiers

PMID27462371
PMCPMC4960687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.