Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27462213›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2016

Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Right Temporo-Parietal Junction Modulates the Use of Mitigating Circumstances during Moral Judgments.

Laëtitia Leloup, Diana Dongo Miletich, Gaëlle Andriet, Yves Vandermeeren, Dana Samson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Moral Judgment: An Overlooked Deficient Domain in Multiple Sclerosis?Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laëtitia LeloupPsychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium.
Diana Dongo MiletichPsychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium.
Gaëlle AndrietPsychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve Belgium.
Yves VandermeerenNeuroModulation Unit, Neurology Department, CHU UCL Namur, Université catholique de Louvain, YvoirBelgium; Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, BrusselsBelgium.
Dana SamsonPsychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-NeuveBelgium; Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, BrusselsBelgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, a few transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) studies have shown that the right temporo-parietal junction (rTPJ) plays a causal role in moral reasoning especially in cases of accidental harms or attempted harms. The profile of results across studies is, however, not entirely consistent: sometimes the stimulation affects predominantly attempted harms while sometimes the stimulation affects predominantly accidental harms. We argue that such discrepancy could reflect different functional contributions of the rTPJ in moral judgments and that the chosen design parameters or stimulation method may differentially bring to light one or the other functional role of the rTPJ. In the current study, we found that tDCS specifically affected accidental harms but not attempted harms. Low cathodal stimulation of the rTPJ led to a marginally significant increase in the severity of judgments of accidental harms (Experiment 1) while higher cathodal current density led to a highly significant decrease in the severity of judgments of accidental harms (Experiment 2). Our pattern of results in the context of our experimental design can best be explained by a causal role of the rTPJ in processing the mitigating circumstances which reduce a protagonist's moral responsibility. We discuss these results in relation to the idea that the rTPJ may play multiple roles in moral cognition and in relation to methodological aspects related to the use of tDCS.

Indexed as

mitigating circumstancesmoral judgmentmoral responsibilityrTPJtDCS

Identifiers

PMID27462213
PMCPMC4940443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.