Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27461975›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Smoking, pregnancy and the subgingival microbiome.

Akshay D Paropkari, Binnaz Leblebicioglu, Lisa M Christian, Purnima S Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Sex Steroid Hormones as a Balancing Factor in Oral Host Microbiome Interactions.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Akshay D ParopkariDivision of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Binnaz LeblebiciogluDivision of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Lisa M ChristianInstitute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Purnima S KumarDivision of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.

Funding

Validation studies for interactive omics: Black raspberry metabolites and the oral microbiome in smokersU01CA188250 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI CLINTON, STEVEN K, KUMAR, PURNIMA · 2014 to 2019
$3.6M
Tobacco smoking and perturbations in the subgingival microbial ecosystemR01DE022579 · NIDCR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KUMAR, PURNIMA · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA188250NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE022579
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The periodontal microbiome is known to be altered during pregnancy as well as by smoking. However, despite the fact that 2.1 million women in the United States smoke during their pregnancy, the potentially synergistic effects of smoking and pregnancy on the subgingival microbiome have never been studied. Subgingival plaque was collected from 44 systemically and periodontally healthy non-pregnant nonsmokers (control), non-pregnant smokers, pregnant nonsmokers and pregnant smokers and sequenced using 16S-pyrotag sequencing. 331601 classifiable sequences were compared against HOMD. Community ordination methods and co-occurrence networks were used along with non-parametric tests to identify differences between groups. Linear Discriminant Analysis revealed significant clustering based on pregnancy and smoking status. Alpha diversity was similar between groups, however, pregnant women (smokers and nonsmokers) demonstrated higher levels of gram-positive and gram-negative facultatives, and lower levels of gram-negative anaerobes when compared to smokers. Each environmental perturbation induced distinctive co-occurrence patterns between species, with unique network anchors in each group. Our study thus suggests that the impact of each environmental perturbation on the periodontal microbiome is unique, and that when they are superimposed, the sum is greater than its parts. The persistence of these effects following cessation of the environmental disruption warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleGingivaHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsSmoking

Identifiers

PMID27461975
PMCPMC4961950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.