Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27461845›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced nursing2017

The challenges and opportunities in researching intimacy and sexuality in care homes accommodating older people: a feasibility study.

Paul Simpson, Christine Brown Wilson, Laura J E Brown, Tommy Dickinson, Maria Horne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced nursing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Not in the Brochure:Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP · 2022
    Article
  8. Effectiveness of a Sexuality Workshop for Nurse Aides in Long-Term Care Facilities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Openness, inclusion and transparency in the practice of public involvement in research: A reflective exercise to develop best practice recommendations.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paul SimpsonOlder People's Understandings of Sexuality(OPUS) research group, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4234-6523
Christine Brown WilsonSchool of Nursing, Social Work and Midwifery, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7861-9538
Laura J E BrownDivision of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, UK.
Tommy DickinsonDivision of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, UK.
Maria HorneSchool of Healthcare, University of Leeds, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore the challenges of conducting research on sexuality and intimacy among older care home residents.

backgroundSexuality and intimacy are neglected in care policies and practices.

designQualitative analytical study drawing on poststructuralist theorizing.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with residents and spouses (n = 6) and care staff (n = 16) in two care homes in Northwest England in 2014. The sample was obtained through a network of 'research-ready' care homes. Thematic analysis was used to make sense of narratives with the aid of NVivo10.

resultsParticipant responses highlight the workings of ageist erotophobic discourse that undergirds the assumption of residents (and old people generally) as postsexual. This materialized in reservations about the research ranging from opposition on moral grounds to doubts about its feasibility given the age-group concerned. However, residents and care home staff can also draw on counter-discourses that resist/challenge ageist erotophobic thinking, which materialized in methodological and ethical recommendations.

conclusionParticipants generally agreed with the principle of the research and made recommendations that could counter/resist ageist erotophobic governance and guide researchers on sampling, style of questioning and communicating with (prospective) study participants on a sensitive subject.

Indexed as

AdolescentAgedAged, 80 and overEnglandFeasibility StudiesFemaleFrail ElderlyHealth PersonnelHomes for the AgedHumansMaleMiddle AgedSexualitySurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultcaredementianursingnursing home careolder peoplepatient participationsexuality

Identifiers

PMID27461845
PMCPMC6881778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.