Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27461105›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2016

An assessment of health research impact in Iran.

Bahareh Yazdizadeh, Reza Majdzadeh, Leila Janani, Farideh Mohtasham, Sima Nikooee, Abdmohammad Mousavi, Farid Najafi, Maryam Atabakzadeh, Azam Bazrafshan, Morteza Zare and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Bahareh YazdizadehKnowledge Utilization Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. byazdizadeh@tums.ac.ir.
Reza MajdzadehKnowledge Utilization Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Leila JananiDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farideh MohtashamKnowledge Utilization Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sima NikooeeKnowledge Utilization Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abdmohammad MousaviSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran.
Farid NajafiResearch Center for Environmental Determinants of Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
Maryam AtabakzadehBushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.
Azam BazrafshanNeuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Morteza ZareNeuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuropharmacology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Manoochehr KaramiSocial Determinants of Health Research Center and Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn recent years, Iran has made significant developments in the field of health sciences. However, the question is whether this considerable increase has affected public health. The research budget has always been negligible and unsustainable in developing countries. Hence, using the Payback Framework, we conducted this study to evaluate the impact of health research in Iran.

methodsBy using a cross-sectional method and two-stage stratified cluster sampling, the projects were randomly selected from six medical universities. A questionnaire was designed according to the Payback Framework and completed by the principle investigators of the randomly selected projects.

resultsThe response rate was 70.4%. Ten point twenty-four percent (10.24%) of the studies had been ordered by a knowledge user organization. The average number of articles published in journals per project was 0.96, and half of the studies had no articles published in Scopus. The results of 12% of the studies had been used in systematic review articles and the same proportion had been utilized in clinical or public health guidelines. The results of 5.3% of the studies had been implemented in the Health Ministry's policymaking. 62% of the studies were expected to affect health directly, 38% of them had been implemented, and among the latter 60% had achieved the expected results. Concerning the economic impacts, the most common expected impact was the reduction of 'days of work missed because of illness or disability' and impact on personal and health system costs. About 36% of these studies had been implemented, and 61% had achieved the expected impact.

conclusionIn most aspects, the status of research impact needs improvement. A comparison of Iran's ranking of knowledge creation and knowledge impact in the Global Innovation Index confirms these findings. The most important problems identified were, not conducting research based on national needs, and the lack of implementation of research results.

Indexed as

Public HealthTranslational Research, BiomedicalBibliometricsCross-Sectional StudiesDelivery of Health CareDeveloping CountriesHealth Care CostsHealth ExpendituresHealth PolicyHumansIranKnowledgePublishingSchools, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesHealth research systemPaybackResearch impact assessment

Identifiers

PMID27461105
PMCPMC4962356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.