Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27461038›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in oncology2016

Relapsed Glioblastoma: Treatment Strategies for Initial and Subsequent Recurrences.

Alicia Tosoni, Enrico Franceschi, Rosalba Poggi, Alba A Brandes

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Nano-Based Technology in Glioblastoma.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Rehabilitation Outcomes for Patients with Motor Deficits after Initial and Repeat Brain Tumor Surgery.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alicia TosoniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Bellaria Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Via Altura 4, Bologna, Italy.
Enrico FranceschiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Bellaria Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Via Altura 4, Bologna, Italy.
Rosalba PoggiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Bellaria Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Via Altura 4, Bologna, Italy.
Alba A BrandesDepartment of Medical Oncology, Bellaria Hospital, Azienda USL-IRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Via Altura 4, Bologna, Italy. alba.brandes@yahoo.it.
Institute of Neurological Sciences · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementAt the time of glioblastoma (GBM) recurrence, a sharp analysis of prognostic factors, disease characteristics, response to adjuvant treatment, and clinical conditions should be performed. A prognostic assessment could allow a careful selection between patients that could be proposed to intensified approaches or palliative setting. Participation in clinical trials aims to improve outcome, and should be encouraged due to dismal prognosis of GBM patients after recurrence. Reoperation should be proposed if the tumor is amenable to a complete resection and if prognostic factors suggest that patient could benefit from a second surgery. Second-line chemotherapy should be chosen based on MGMT status, time to disease recurrence, and toxicity profile. If enrollment into a clinical trial is not possible, a nitrosourea-based regimen is the preferred choice, carefully evaluating any previous temozolomide (TMZ)-related toxicity. In MGMT-methylated patients relapsing after TMZ completion, a rechallenge could be proposed. After second progression, the clinical advantage of subsequent lines of chemotherapy still needs to be clarified. However, based on performance status, patients' preference, and disease behavior, a third-line treatment could be considered. Available treatments include nitrosoureas, bevacizumab, or carboplatin plus etoposide. However, more effective therapeutic options are needed.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyGlioblastomaHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceRetreatmentTreatment OutcomeChemotherapyRadiotherapyRecurrent glioblastomaSurgeryTreatment

Identifiers

PMID27461038
OpenAlexW2478972716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.