Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27460974›Full record

ArticleeLife2016

Different promoter affinities account for specificity in MYC-dependent gene regulation.

Francesca Lorenzin, Uwe Benary, Apoorva Baluapuri, Susanne Walz, Lisa Anna Jung, Björn von Eyss, Caroline Kisker, Jana Wolf, Martin Eilers, Elmar Wolf

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 109 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
109citing papers in PubMed
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

109 citing papers in PubMed, 165 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dynamic Supercoiling Sponsors Transcription Amplification by MYC.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

49 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca LorenzinDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Uwe BenaryGroup Mathematical Modeling of Cellular Processes, Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Apoorva BaluapuriDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Susanne WalzCore Unit Bioinformatics, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Lisa Anna JungDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Björn von EyssDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Caroline KiskerRudolf-Virchow-Center for Experimental Biomedicine, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Jana WolfGroup Mathematical Modeling of Cellular Processes, Max-Delbrück-Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Martin EilersDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Elmar WolfDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5299-6335
University of Würzburg · DEMax Delbrück Center · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enhanced expression of the MYC transcription factor is observed in the majority of tumors. Two seemingly conflicting models have been proposed for its function: one proposes that MYC enhances expression of all genes, while the other model suggests gene-specific regulation. Here, we have explored the hypothesis that specific gene expression profiles arise since promoters differ in affinity for MYC and high-affinity promoters are fully occupied by physiological levels of MYC. We determined cellular MYC levels and used RNA- and ChIP-sequencing to correlate promoter occupancy with gene expression at different concentrations of MYC. Mathematical modeling showed that binding affinities for interactions of MYC with DNA and with core promoter-bound factors, such as WDR5, are sufficient to explain promoter occupancies observed in vivo. Importantly, promoter affinity stratifies different biological processes that are regulated by MYC, explaining why tumor-specific MYC levels induce specific gene expression programs and alter defined biological properties of cells.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationPromoter Regions, GeneticTranscription, GeneticCell LineChromatin ImmunoprecipitationDNAEpithelial CellsGene Expression ProfilingHumansModels, TheoreticalProtein BindingProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycSequence Analysis, DNASequence Analysis, RNADNAProto-Oncogene Proteins c-myccancer biologycell biologyChIP-sequencinghumanmathematical modelingMIZ1mouseMYCpromoter affinityWDR5

Identifiers

PMID27460974
PMCPMC4963202
OpenAlexW2493417617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.