Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27460692›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of applied physiology2016

Metabolic responses to whole-body vibration: effect of frequency and amplitude.

Jie Kang, Tara Porfido, Craig Ismaili, Soraya Selamie, Jermey Kuper, Jill A Bush, Nicholas A Ratamess, Avery D Faigenbaum

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of applied physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jie KangHuman Performance Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, The College of New Jersey, 222 Packer Hall, Ewing, NJ, 08628, USA. kang@tcnj.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7836-9252
Tara PorfidoHuman Performance Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, The College of New Jersey, 222 Packer Hall, Ewing, NJ, 08628, USA.
Craig IsmailiHuman Performance Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, The College of New Jersey, 222 Packer Hall, Ewing, NJ, 08628, USA.
Soraya SelamieHuman Performance Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, The College of New Jersey, 222 Packer Hall, Ewing, NJ, 08628, USA.
Jermey KuperHuman Performance Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, The College of New Jersey, 222 Packer Hall, Ewing, NJ, 08628, USA.
Jill A BushHuman Performance Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, The College of New Jersey, 222 Packer Hall, Ewing, NJ, 08628, USA.
Nicholas A RatamessHuman Performance Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, The College of New Jersey, 222 Packer Hall, Ewing, NJ, 08628, USA.
Avery D FaigenbaumHuman Performance Laboratory, Department of Health and Exercise Science, The College of New Jersey, 222 Packer Hall, Ewing, NJ, 08628, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study assessed the effect of whole-body vibration (WBV) of varying frequency and amplitude on metabolic responses during WBV treatment and subsequent aerobic exercise.

methodsEight men and eight women (21.0 ± 1.9 years) underwent one no-WBV (NV) and six WBV at 30 Hz/low amplitude (30L), 30 Hz/high amplitude (30H), 40 Hz/low amplitude (40L), 40 Hz/high amplitude (40H), 50 Hz/low amplitude (50L), and 50 Hz/high amplitude (50H). During each protocol, subjects performed ten sets of ten body weight squats with 1-min rest period between sets on a vibration platform with a load that represented one of the six frequency-amplitude combinations. Each WBV treatment was immediately followed by 20 min of cycle exercise at 65 % VO2peak. Oxygen uptake (VO2) and rates of carbohydrate (COX) and fat oxidation (FOX) were measured during both the WBV session and subsequent exercise.

resultsDuring WBV, VO2 was higher (p < 0.05) in 40H, 50L and 50H than NV and in 50H than 30L, 30H and 40L. COX was higher (p < 0.05) in 40H, 50L, and 50H than NV, whereas FOX remained indifferent across all protocols. During subsequent exercise, VO2 was higher (p < 0.05) in 50L and 50H than NV and in 50H than 30L. No between-protocol differences were seen for COX or FOX.

conclusionWBV combined with body weight squats can augment VO2 at 40 Hz of high amplitude and 50 Hz of both low and high amplitudes. This metabolic potentiation remains in effect during subsequent aerobic exercise. WBV did not affect fat oxidation across all vibratory loads.

Indexed as

VibrationCarbohydrate MetabolismExerciseFemaleHumansMaleOxygen ConsumptionPhysical Conditioning, HumanPhysical StimulationYoung AdultAmplitudeBody massFrequencyOxygen uptakeSubstrate utilizationVibration

Identifiers

PMID27460692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.