ArticleScientific reports2016
Novel HDAd/EBV Reprogramming Vector and Highly Efficient Ad/CRISPR-Cas Sickle Cell Disease Gene Correction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome editing strategies for targeted correction of β-globin mutation in sickle cell disease: From bench to bedside.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Review
- Comprehensive review of CRISPR-based gene editing: mechanisms, challenges, and applications in cancer therapy.Molecular cancer · 2024Review
- Prime editing-mediated correction of the CFTR W1282X mutation in iPSCs and derived airway epithelial cells.PloS one · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular consequences of sickle cell disease.Biophysics reviews · 2022Review
- Myd88 knockdown with RNA interference induces in vitro immune hyporesponsiveness in dendritic cells from rhesus monkeys.Immunogenetics · 2022Article
- Article
- An Overview on Promising Somatic Cell Sources Utilized for the Efficient Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2021Review
- RNF2 ablation reprograms the tumor-immune microenvironment and stimulates durable NK and CD4Nature cancer · 2021Article
- Therapeutic gene editing strategies using CRISPR-Cas9 for the β-hemoglobinopathies.Journal of biomedical research · 2020Article
- Modeling Psychiatric Disorder Biology with Stem Cells.Current psychiatry reports · 2020Review
- Gene Editing in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells: Recent Advances for Clinical Therapies.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2020Review
- Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Sickle Cell Disease: From Basics to Therapeutics.The American journal of pathology · 2019Review
- CRISPR-Cas: Converting A Bacterial Defence Mechanism into A State-of-the-Art Genetic Manipulation Tool.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- CRISPR/Cas9: the Jedi against the dark empire of diseases.Journal of biomedical science · 2018Review
- Updated summary of genome editing technology in human cultured cells linked to human genetics studies.Journal of human genetics · 2018Review
- Sickle cell disease: a malady beyond a hemoglobin defect in cerebrovascular disease.Expert review of hematology · 2018Review
- Therapeutic gene editing: delivery and regulatory perspectives.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2017Review
- Long-Term Engraftment and Fetal Globin Induction uponMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2017Article
- Induced pluripotent stem cell technology: a decade of progress.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2017Review
- Technical Improvement and Application of Hydrodynamic Gene Delivery in Study of Liver Diseases.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CRISPR/Cas enhanced correction of the sickle cell disease (SCD) genetic defect in patient-specific induced Pluripotent Stem Cells (iPSCs) provides a potential gene therapy for this debilitating disease. An advantage of this approach is that corrected iPSCs that are free of off-target modifications can be identified before differentiating the cells into hematopoietic progenitors for transplantation. In order for this approach to be practical, iPSC generation must be rapid and efficient. Therefore, we developed a novel helper-dependent adenovirus/Epstein-Barr virus (HDAd/EBV) hybrid reprogramming vector, rCLAE-R6, that delivers six reprogramming factors episomally. HDAd/EBV transduction of keratinocytes from SCD patients resulted in footprint-free iPSCs with high efficiency. Subsequently, the sickle mutation was corrected by delivering CRISPR/Cas9 with adenovirus followed by nucleoporation with a 70 nt single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotide (ssODN) correction template. Correction efficiencies of up to 67.9% (β(A)/[β(S)+β(A)]) were obtained. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of corrected iPSC lines demonstrated no CRISPR/Cas modifications in 1467 potential off-target sites and no modifications in tumor suppressor genes or other genes associated with pathologies. These results demonstrate that adenoviral delivery of reprogramming factors and CRISPR/Cas provides a rapid and efficient method of deriving gene-corrected, patient-specific iPSCs for therapeutic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.