Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27460620›Full record

Trial reportSchizophrenia bulletin2016

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Group Coping-Oriented Therapy vs Supportive Therapy in Schizophrenia: Results of a 2-Year Follow-up.

Annette Schaub, Kim T Mueser, Thomas von Werder, Rolf Engel, Hans-Jürgen Möller, Peter Falkai

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Self-management interventions for people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Annette SchaubDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany; annette.schaub@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Kim T MueserCenter for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, Boston, MA.
Thomas von WerderDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany;
Rolf EngelDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany;
Hans-Jürgen MöllerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany;
Peter FalkaiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Munich, Germany;
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEBoston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOver the past 30 years, illness management programs and cognitive-behavioral therapy for psychosis have gained prominence in the treatment of schizophrenia. However, little is known about the long-term benefits of these types of programs when delivered during inpatient treatment following a symptom exacerbation. To evaluate this question, we conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing the long-term effects of a group-based coping-oriented program (COP) that combined the elements of illness management with cognitive behavioral-therapy for psychosis, with an equally intensive supportive therapy (SUP) program.

method196 inpatients with DSM-IV schizophrenia were randomized to COP or SUP, each lasting 12 sessions provided over 6-8 weeks. Outcome measures were collected in the hospital at baseline and post-assessment, and following discharge into the community 1 and 2 years later. We compared the groups on rehospitalizations, symptoms, psychosocial functioning, and knowledge about psychosis.

resultsIntent-to-treat analyses indicated that patients in COP learned significantly more information about psychosis, and had greater reductions in overall symptoms and depression/anxiety over the treatment and follow-up period than patients in SUP. Patients in both groups improved significantly in other symptoms and psychosocial functioning. There were no differences between the groups in hospitalization rates, which were low.

conclusionsPeople with schizophrenia can benefit from short-term COPs delivered during the inpatient phase, with improvements sustaining for 2 years following discharge from the hospital. More research is needed to evaluate the long-term impact of coping-oriented and similar programs provided during inpatient treatment.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychotherapyPsychotherapy, GroupSchizophreniacognitive-behavioral therapycopingeffectivenessillness managementpsychoeducationschizophreniasupportive therapy

Identifiers

PMID27460620
PMCPMC4960437
OpenAlexW2478835817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.