Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27460589›Full record

ArticleJournal of theoretical biology2016

Comparison of genomic data via statistical distribution.

Saeid Amiri, Ivo D Dinov

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of theoretical biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Saeid AmiriUniversity of Wisconsin-Green Bay, Department of Natural and Applied Sciences, Green Bay, WI, USA. Electronic address: saeid.amiri1@gmail.com.
Ivo D DinovStatistics Online Computational Resource (SOCR), Michigan Institute for Data Science (MIDAS), School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 49109, USA. Electronic address: dinov@umich.edu.

Funding

Pilot and Feasibility (P and F) ProgramP30DK089503 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Joyce Lee · 2010 to 2026
$20.3M
TrainingU54EB020406 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI TOGA, ARTHUR W · 2014 to 2018
$12.5M
Michigan Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG053760 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PAULSON, HENRY L · 2016 to 2020
$10.1M
Public Outreach and Education CoreP50NS091856 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ALBIN, ROGER L · 2014 to 2019
$10.1M
Pilot Projects CoreP20NR015331 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LARSON, JANET L. · 2014 to 2018
$1.3M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG053760NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB020406NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK089503NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS091856NINR NIH HHS P20 NR015331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sequence comparison has become an essential tool in bioinformatics, because highly homologous sequences usually imply significant functional or structural similarity. Traditional sequence analysis techniques are based on preprocessing and alignment, which facilitate measuring and quantitative characterization of genetic differences, variability and complexity. However, recent developments of next generation and whole genome sequencing technologies give rise to new challenges that are related to measuring similarity and capturing rearrangements of large segments contained in the genome. This work is devoted to illustrating different methods recently introduced for quantifying sequence distances and variability. Most of the alignment-free methods rely on counting words, which are small contiguous fragments of the genome. Our approach considers the locations of nucleotides in the sequences and relies more on appropriate statistical distributions. The results of this technique for comparing sequences, by extracting information and comparing matching fidelity and location regularization information, are very encouraging, specifically to classify mutation sequences.

Indexed as

GenomeStatistical DistributionsAlgorithmsBase SequenceCluster AnalysisGenome, BacterialGenome, MitochondrialGenomicsHerpesviridaeMutationPhylogenyAlignment-freeClusteringDistanceK-tuple

Identifiers

PMID27460589
PMCPMC5361063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.