Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27460473›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2016

The effectiveness and safety of proton beam radiation therapy in children with malignant central nervous system (CNS) tumours: protocol for a systematic review.

Caroline Main, Madhumita Dandapani, Mark Pritchard, Rachel Dodds, Simon P Stevens, Nicky Thorp, Roger E Taylor, Keith Wheatley, Barry Pizer, Matthew Morrall and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Caroline MainCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. c.main@bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9686-3438
Madhumita DandapaniBirmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Mark PritchardRoyal Stoke University Hospital, Stroke-on-Trent, UK.
Rachel DoddsLeeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Simon P StevensCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Nicky ThorpThe Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Liverpool, UK.
Roger E TaylorSwansea University, Swansea, UK.
Keith WheatleyCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Barry PizerAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Matthew MorrallLeeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Robert PhillipsLeeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK.
Martin EnglishBirmingham Children's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Pamela R KearnsCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Sophie WilneQueen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals' NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Jayne S WilsonCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit (CRCTU), Institute of Cancer and Genomic Science, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit · GBBirmingham Children's Hospital · GBLeeds General Infirmary · GBAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust · GBClatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBRoyal Stoke University Hospital · GBSwansea University · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15958Department of Health PB-PG-1112-29122Medical Research Council G0800472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study is to use a systematic review framework to identify and synthesise the evidence on the use of proton beam therapy (PBT) for the treatment of children with CNS tumours and where possible compare this to the use of photon radiotherapy (RT).

methodsStandard systematic review methods aimed at minimising bias will be employed for study identification, selection and data extraction. Twelve electronic databases have been searched, and further citation, hand searching and reference checking will be employed. Studies assessing the effects of PBT used either alone or as part of a multimodality treatment regimen in children with CNS tumours will be included. Relevant economic evaluations will also be identified. The outcomes are survival (overall, progression-free, event-free, disease-free), local and regional control rates, short- and long-term adverse events, functional status measures and quality of survival. Two reviewers will independently screen and select studies for inclusion in the review. All interventional study designs will be eligible for inclusion in the review. However, initial scoping searches indicate the evidence base is likely to be limited to case series studies, with no studies of a higher quality being identified. Quality assessment will be undertaken using pre-specified criteria and tailored to study design if applicable. Studies will be combined using a narrative synthesis, with differences in results between studies highlighted and discussed in relation to the patient population, intervention and study quality. Where appropriate, if no studies of a comparative design are identified, outcomes will be compared against a range of estimates from the literature for similar populations and treatment regimens from the best available evidence from studies that include the use of advanced conventional photon therapy. DISCUSSION: The evidence base for the use of PBT in children with CNS tumours is likely to be relatively sparse, highly heterogeneous and potentially of a low quality with small sample sizes. Furthermore, selection and publication biases may limit the internal and external validity of studies. However, any tentative results from the review on potential treatment effects can be used to plan better quality research studies that are of a design appropriate for outcome comparison with conventional therapy. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015029583.

Indexed as

ProtonsCentral Nervous SystemCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsChildHumansProton TherapyResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicProtonsCentral nervous system tumoursChildrenConventional photon RTProton beam RTSystematic reviews

Identifiers

PMID27460473
PMCPMC4962509
OpenAlexW2494534223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.