Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27460420›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2016

An innovative strategy for the molecular diagnosis of Usher syndrome identifies causal biallelic mutations in 93% of European patients.

Crystel Bonnet, Zied Riahi, Sandra Chantot-Bastaraud, Luce Smagghe, Mélanie Letexier, Charles Marcaillou, Gaëlle M Lefèvre, Jean-Pierre Hardelin, Aziz El-Amraoui, Amrit Singh-Estivalet and 27 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genetics of prelingual isolated deafness and Usher syndrome in the Maghreb and Jordan: Harnessing the potential of homozygosity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Haploinsufficiency of Whrn Contributes to Progressive Sensorineural Hearing Loss in C57BL6 Mice.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. ZebrafishInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. A Comparative Evaluation of the Genetic Variant Spectrum in theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Optical coherence tomography biomarkers in MYO7A-inherited retinal dystrophy: longitudinal study in pediatric patients.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors at 17 institutions in 6 countries.

Crystel BonnetINSERM UMRS 1120, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.
Zied RiahiINSERM UMRS 1120, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.
Sandra Chantot-BastaraudService de Génétique et d'Embryologie Médicales, APHP Hôpital Armand Trousseau, Paris, France.
Luce SmaggheINSERM UMRS 1120, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.
Mélanie LetexierIntegraGen SA, Genopole CAMPUS 1 bât. G8, EVRY, Paris, France.
Charles MarcaillouIntegraGen SA, Genopole CAMPUS 1 bât. G8, EVRY, Paris, France.
Gaëlle M LefèvreINSERM UMRS 1120, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.
Jean-Pierre HardelinUnité de Génétique et Physiologie de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Aziz El-AmraouiUnité de Génétique et Physiologie de l'Audition, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.
Amrit Singh-EstivaletINSERM UMRS 1120, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.
Saddek Mohand-SaïdUPMC-Sorbonnes Universités Paris VI, Paris, France.
Susanne KohlCentre for Ophthalmology, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Anne KurtenbachCentre for Ophthalmology, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Ieva SliesoraityteCentre d'Investigation Clinique, Direction de l'Hospitalisation et de l'Organisation des Soins, Centre Hospitalier National d'Ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts, Paris, France.
Ditta ZoborCentre for Ophthalmology, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Souad GherbiCentre de référence des Surdités Génétiques, Service de Génétique, APHP Hôpital Necker, Paris, France.
Francesco TestaEye Clinic, Multidisciplinary Department of Medical, Surgical and Dental Sciences Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Francesca SimonelliEye Clinic, Multidisciplinary Department of Medical, Surgical and Dental Sciences Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Sandro BanfiTIGEM (Telethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine), Pozzuoli, Italy.
Ana FakinEye Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Damjan GlavačDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Pathology, University of Ljubljana, Korytkova, Ljubljana.
Martina Jarc-VidmarEye Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Andrej ZupanDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Pathology, University of Ljubljana, Korytkova, Ljubljana.
Saba BattelinoDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloska 2, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Loreto Martorell SampolHospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria Antonia ClaveriaHospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
Jaume Catala MoraHospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
Shzeena DadKennedy Center, Gl. Landevej, Glostrup, Denmark.
Lisbeth B MøllerKennedy Center, Gl. Landevej, Glostrup, Denmark.
Jesus Rodriguez JorgeHospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
Marko HawlinaEye Hospital, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Alberto AuricchioTIGEM (Telethon Institute of Genetics and Medicine), Pozzuoli, Italy.
José-Alain SahelUPMC-Sorbonnes Universités Paris VI, Paris, France.
Sandrine MarlinCentre de référence des Surdités Génétiques, Service de Génétique, APHP Hôpital Necker, Paris, France.
Eberhart ZrennerCentre for Ophthalmology, Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Isabelle AudoUPMC-Sorbonnes Universités Paris VI, Paris, France.
Christine PetitINSERM UMRS 1120, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France.
Hospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona · ESSTZ eyetrial · DEInserm · FRInstitut Pasteur · FRLjubljana University Medical Centre · SIUniversity of Ljubljana · SIAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRGenopole (France) · FRInstitut de la Vision · FRKennedy Center · DKSorbonne Université · FRUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · ITCentre hospitalier national d'ophtalmologie des Quinze-Vingts · FRHôpital Armand-Trousseau · FRTelethon Institute Of Genetics And Medicine · ITUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Usher syndrome (USH), the most prevalent cause of hereditary deafness-blindness, is an autosomal recessive and genetically heterogeneous disorder. Three clinical subtypes (USH1-3) are distinguishable based on the severity of the sensorineural hearing impairment, the presence or absence of vestibular dysfunction, and the age of onset of the retinitis pigmentosa. A total of 10 causal genes, 6 for USH1, 3 for USH2, and 1 for USH3, and an USH2 modifier gene, have been identified. A robust molecular diagnosis is required not only to improve genetic counseling, but also to advance gene therapy in USH patients. Here, we present an improved diagnostic strategy that is both cost- and time-effective. It relies on the sequential use of three different techniques to analyze selected genomic regions: targeted exome sequencing, comparative genome hybridization, and quantitative exon amplification. We screened a large cohort of 427 patients (139 USH1, 282 USH2, and six of undefined clinical subtype) from various European medical centers for mutations in all USH genes and the modifier gene. We identified a total of 421 different sequence variants predicted to be pathogenic, about half of which had not been previously reported. Remarkably, we detected large genomic rearrangements, most of which were novel and unique, in 9% of the patients. Thus, our strategy led to the identification of biallelic and monoallelic mutations in 92.7% and 5.8% of the USH patients, respectively. With an overall 98.5% mutation characterization rate, the diagnosis efficiency was substantially improved compared with previously reported methods.

Indexed as

MutationAllelesComparative Genomic HybridizationEuropeExomeExtracellular Matrix ProteinsGenes, ModifierGenetic TestingHumansSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNAUsher SyndromesExtracellular Matrix ProteinsUSH2A protein, human

Identifiers

PMID27460420
PMCPMC5117943
OpenAlexW2505997298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.