Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27460335›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Nitrous oxide emission related to ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and mitigation options from N fertilization in a tropical soil.

Johnny R Soares, Noriko A Cassman, Anna M Kielak, Agata Pijl, Janaína B Carmo, Kesia S Lourenço, Hendrikus J Laanbroek, Heitor Cantarella, Eiko E Kuramae

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. NEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Nitrification inhibitors effectively target NEnvironmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Frontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Johnny R SoaresDepartment of Microbial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, 6708 PB, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Noriko A CassmanDepartment of Microbial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, 6708 PB, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Anna M KielakDepartment of Microbial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, 6708 PB, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Agata PijlDepartment of Microbial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, 6708 PB, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Janaína B CarmoEnvironmental Science Department, Federal University of São Carlos, 1852-780, Sorocaba, SP, Brazil.
Kesia S LourençoDepartment of Microbial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, 6708 PB, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Hendrikus J LaanbroekDepartment of Microbial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, 6708 PB, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Heitor CantarellaSoils and Environmental Resources Center, Agronomic Institute of Campinas, P.O. Box 28, 13012-970, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Eiko E KuramaeDepartment of Microbial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, 6708 PB, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Netherlands Institute of Ecology · NLAgronomical Institute of Campinas · BRUniversidade Federal de São Carlos · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitrous oxide (N2O) from nitrogen fertilizers applied to sugarcane has high environmental impact on ethanol production. This study aimed to determine the main microbial processes responsible for the N2O emissions from soil fertilized with different N sources, to identify options to mitigate N2O emissions, and to determine the impacts of the N sources on the soil microbiome. In a field experiment, nitrogen was applied as calcium nitrate, urea, urea with dicyandiamide or 3,4 dimethylpyrazone phosphate nitrification inhibitors (NIs), and urea coated with polymer and sulfur (PSCU). Urea caused the highest N2O emissions (1.7% of N applied) and PSCU did not reduce cumulative N2O emissions compared to urea. NIs reduced N2O emissions (95%) compared to urea and had emissions comparable to those of the control (no N). Similarly, calcium nitrate resulted in very low N2O emissions. Interestingly, N2O emissions were significantly correlated only with bacterial amoA, but not with denitrification gene (nirK, nirS, nosZ) abundances, suggesting that ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, via the nitrification pathway, were the main contributors to N2O emissions. Moreover, the treatments had little effect on microbial composition or diversity. We suggest nitrate-based fertilizers or the addition of NIs in NH4(+)-N based fertilizers as viable options for reducing N2O emissions in tropical soils and lessening the environmental impact of biofuel produced from sugarcane.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologyAmmoniaFertilizersGreenhouse GasesNitrogen CycleNitrogen FixationNitrous OxideSoilTropical ClimateUreaAmmoniaFertilizersGreenhouse GasesNitrous OxideSoilUrea

Identifiers

PMID27460335
PMCPMC4962081
OpenAlexW2497254039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.