Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27460182›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2016

Workflow-driven clinical decision support for personalized oncology.

Anca Bucur, Jasper van Leeuwen, Nikolaos Christodoulou, Kamana Sigdel, Katerina Argyri, Lefteris Koumakis, Norbert Graf, Georgios Stamatakos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring theFrontiers in physiology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anca BucurPrecision and Decentralized Diagnostics, Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. anca.bucur@philips.com.
Jasper van LeeuwenPrecision and Decentralized Diagnostics, Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Nikolaos ChristodoulouNational Technical University of Athens, ICCS, Athens, Greece.
Kamana SigdelPrecision and Decentralized Diagnostics, Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Katerina ArgyriNational Technical University of Athens, ICCS, Athens, Greece.
Lefteris KoumakisComputational BioMedicine Laboratory, FORTH-ICS, Heraklion, Greece.
Norbert GrafDepartment of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Georgios StamatakosNational Technical University of Athens, ICCS, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe adoption in oncology of Clinical Decision Support (CDS) may help clinical users to efficiently deal with the high complexity of the domain, lead to improved patient outcomes, and reduce the current knowledge gap between clinical research and practice. While significant effort has been invested in the implementation of CDS, the uptake in the clinic has been limited. The barriers to adoption have been extensively discussed in the literature. In oncology, current CDS solutions are not able to support the complex decisions required for stratification and personalized treatment of patients and to keep up with the high rate of change in therapeutic options and knowledge.

resultsTo address these challenges, we propose a framework enabling efficient implementation of meaningful CDS that incorporates a large variety of clinical knowledge models to bring to the clinic comprehensive solutions leveraging the latest domain knowledge. We use both literature-based models and models built within the p-medicine project using the rich datasets from clinical trials and care provided by the clinical partners. The framework is open to the biomedical community, enabling reuse of deployed models by third-party CDS implementations and supporting collaboration among modelers, CDS implementers, biomedical researchers and clinicians. To increase adoption and cope with the complexity of patient management in oncology, we also support and leverage the clinical processes adhered to by healthcare organizations. We design an architecture that extends the CDS framework with workflow functionality. The clinical models are embedded in the workflow models and executed at the right time, when and where the recommendations are needed in the clinical process.

conclusionsIn this paper we present our CDS framework developed in p-medicine and the CDS implementation leveraging the framework. To support complex decisions, the framework relies on clinical models that encapsulate relevant clinical knowledge. Next to assisting the decisions, this solution supports by default (through modeling and implementation of workflows) the decision processes as well and exploits the knowledge embedded in those processes.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalModels, TheoreticalHumansMedical OncologyPrecision MedicineCDS adoptionClinical decision supportClinical workflowsKnowledge modelsOncology

Identifiers

PMID27460182
PMCPMC4965727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.