Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27459987›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2016

Early Recurrence and Omission of Adjuvant Therapy after Pancreaticoduodenectomy Argue against a Surgery-First Approach.

Brent T Xia, David A Habib, Vikrom K Dhar, Nick C Levinsky, Young Kim, Dennis J Hanseman, Jeffrey M Sutton, Gregory C Wilson, Milton Smith, Kyuran Ann Choe and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Hepatic Steatosis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer: Incidence and Implications for Outcomes After Pancreatoduodenectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY: IMPACT OF THE TECHNIQUE ON OPERATIVE OUTCOMES AND SURGICAL MORTALITY.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2019
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Association of Adjuvant Therapy with Improved Survival in Ampullary Cancer: A National Cohort Study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018
    Article
  14. Recent Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Surgery.Current treatment options in gastroenterology · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brent T XiaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
David A HabibCollege of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Vikrom K DharDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Nick C LevinskyDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Young KimDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Dennis J HansemanDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Jeffrey M SuttonDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Gregory C WilsonDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Milton SmithDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Kyuran Ann ChoeDepartment of Radiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Jeffrey J SussmanDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Syed A AhmadDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Daniel E AbbottDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA. abbott@surgery.wisc.edu.
University of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

HOST RESPONSE TO TRAUMA RESEARCH TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008478 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI TIMOTHY A PRITTS, BASILIA ZINGARELLI · 1993 to 2026
$6.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008478
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSequencing therapy for patients with periampullary malignancy is controversial. Clinical trial data report high rates of adjuvant therapy completion, though contemporary, real-world rates remain incomplete. We sought to identify patients who failed to receive adjuvant therapy and those at risk for early recurrence (ER) who might benefit most from neoadjuvant therapy (NT).

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed medical records of 201 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary malignancies between 1999 and 2015; patients receiving NT were excluded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of failure to receive adjuvant therapy and ER (within 6 months) as the primary end points.

resultsThe median age at the time of surgery was 65.5 years (interquartile range 57-74 years). The majority of tumors were pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (76.6 %), and 71.6 % of patients received adjuvant therapy after resection. Univariate predictors of failure to undergo adjuvant therapy were advanced age, age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index, operative transfusion, reoperation, length of stay, and 30- to 90-day readmissions (all p < 0.05). Advanced age, specifically among patients >70 years, persisted as a significant preoperative predictor on multivariate analysis (p < 0.01). Patients who failed to receive adjuvant therapy and/or developed ER had significantly worse overall survival rates compared to all other patients (27.8 vs. 9.7 months; p < 0.01).

conclusionsApproximately one-third of surgery-first patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at our institution did not receive adjuvant therapy and/or demonstrated ER. This substantial subset of patients may particularly benefit from NT, ensuring completion of multimodal therapy and/or avoiding futile surgical intervention.

Indexed as

Ampulla of VaterAgedAge FactorsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCombined Modality TherapyCommon Bile Duct NeoplasmsDuodenal NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomyRetrospective StudiesSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID27459987
PMCPMC5108049
OpenAlexW2477563586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.