Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27459846›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2016

Ensembles of randomized trees using diverse distributed representations of clinical events.

Aron Henriksson, Jing Zhao, Hercules Dalianis, Henrik Boström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aron HenrikssonDepartment of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, Borgarfjordsgatan 12, Kista, SE-16407, Sweden. aronhen@dsv.su.se.
Jing ZhaoDepartment of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, Borgarfjordsgatan 12, Kista, SE-16407, Sweden.
Hercules DalianisDepartment of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, Borgarfjordsgatan 12, Kista, SE-16407, Sweden.
Henrik BoströmDepartment of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, Borgarfjordsgatan 12, Kista, SE-16407, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLearning deep representations of clinical events based on their distributions in electronic health records has been shown to allow for subsequent training of higher-performing predictive models compared to the use of shallow, count-based representations. The predictive performance may be further improved by utilizing multiple representations of the same events, which can be obtained by, for instance, manipulating the representation learning procedure. The question, however, remains how to make best use of a set of diverse representations of clinical events - modeled in an ensemble of semantic spaces - for the purpose of predictive modeling.

methodsThree different ways of exploiting a set of (ten) distributed representations of four types of clinical events - diagnosis codes, drug codes, measurements, and words in clinical notes - are investigated in a series of experiments using ensembles of randomized trees. Here, the semantic space ensembles are obtained by varying the context window size in the representation learning procedure. The proposed method trains a forest wherein each tree is built from a bootstrap replicate of the training set whose entire original feature set is represented in a randomly selected set of semantic spaces - corresponding to the considered data types - of a given context window size.

resultsThe proposed method significantly outperforms concatenating the multiple representations of the bagged dataset; it also significantly outperforms representing, for each decision tree, only a subset of the features in a randomly selected set of semantic spaces. A follow-up analysis indicates that the proposed method exhibits less diversity while significantly improving average tree performance. It is also shown that the size of the semantic space ensemble has a significant impact on predictive performance and that performance tends to improve as the size increases.

conclusionsThe strategy for utilizing a set of diverse distributed representations of clinical events when constructing ensembles of randomized trees has a significant impact on predictive performance. The most successful strategy - significantly outperforming the considered alternatives - involves randomly sampling distributed representations of the clinical events when building each decision tree in the forest.

Indexed as

Decision TreesDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsElectronic Health RecordsMachine LearningModels, TheoreticalPharmacovigilanceHumansSemanticsAdverse drug eventsDistributional semanticsElectronic health recordsHeterogeneous dataPharmacovigilanceRandom forest

Identifiers

PMID27459846
PMCPMC4965720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.