ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2016
Ensembles of randomized trees using diverse distributed representations of clinical events.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Systematic review of AI-based models in pharmacoepidemiology for adverse drug event prediction and detection.Frontiers in drug safety and regulation · 2026Pooled it
- Computational Advances in Drug Safety: Systematic and Mapping Review of Knowledge Engineering Based Approaches.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Pooled it
- Predicting Early Dysphagia in Acute Ischemic Stroke Using an Explainable Machine Learning Model.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Missing data in bioarchaeology II: A test of ordinal and continuous data imputation.American journal of biological anthropology · 2022Article
- EHR phenotyping via jointly embedding medical concepts and words into a unified vector space.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2018Article
- Evaluating parameters for ligand-based modeling with random forest on sparse data sets.Journal of cheminformatics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLearning deep representations of clinical events based on their distributions in electronic health records has been shown to allow for subsequent training of higher-performing predictive models compared to the use of shallow, count-based representations. The predictive performance may be further improved by utilizing multiple representations of the same events, which can be obtained by, for instance, manipulating the representation learning procedure. The question, however, remains how to make best use of a set of diverse representations of clinical events - modeled in an ensemble of semantic spaces - for the purpose of predictive modeling.
methodsThree different ways of exploiting a set of (ten) distributed representations of four types of clinical events - diagnosis codes, drug codes, measurements, and words in clinical notes - are investigated in a series of experiments using ensembles of randomized trees. Here, the semantic space ensembles are obtained by varying the context window size in the representation learning procedure. The proposed method trains a forest wherein each tree is built from a bootstrap replicate of the training set whose entire original feature set is represented in a randomly selected set of semantic spaces - corresponding to the considered data types - of a given context window size.
resultsThe proposed method significantly outperforms concatenating the multiple representations of the bagged dataset; it also significantly outperforms representing, for each decision tree, only a subset of the features in a randomly selected set of semantic spaces. A follow-up analysis indicates that the proposed method exhibits less diversity while significantly improving average tree performance. It is also shown that the size of the semantic space ensemble has a significant impact on predictive performance and that performance tends to improve as the size increases.
conclusionsThe strategy for utilizing a set of diverse distributed representations of clinical events when constructing ensembles of randomized trees has a significant impact on predictive performance. The most successful strategy - significantly outperforming the considered alternatives - involves randomly sampling distributed representations of the clinical events when building each decision tree in the forest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.