Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27459688›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Reliability of MR-Based Volumetric 3-D Analysis of Pelvic Muscles among Subjects with Low Back with Leg Pain and Healthy Volunteers.

Elżbieta Skorupska, Przemysław Keczmer, Rafał M Łochowski, Paulina Tomal, Michał Rychlik, Włodzimierz Samborski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Progressive renal failure complicated by transient and recurrent ureteral obstruction.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elżbieta SkorupskaDepartment of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Przemysław KeczmerDepartment of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Rafał M ŁochowskiDepartment of Mathematics and Mathematical Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Warsaw, Poland.
Paulina TomalDepartment of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Michał RychlikDepartment of Virtual Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland.
Włodzimierz SamborskiDepartment of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PLPoznań University of Technology · PLSGH Warsaw School of Economics · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimLately, the diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging, Lasègue sign and classic neurological signs have been considered not accurate enough to distinguish the radicular from non-radicular low back with leg pain (LBLP) and a calculation of the symptomatic side muscle volume has been indicated as a probable valuable marker. However, only the multifidus muscle volume has been calculated so far. The main objective of the study was to verify whether LBLP subjects presented symptomatic side pelvic muscle atrophy compared to healthy volunteers. The second aim was to assess the inter-rater reliability of 3-D manual method for segmenting and measuring the volume of the gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, gluteus minimus and piriformis muscles in both LBLP patients and healthy subjects.

methodTwo independent raters analyzed MR images of LBLP and healthy subjects towards muscle volume of four pelvic muscles, i.e. the piriformis, gluteus minimus, gluteus medius and gluteus maximus. For both sides, the MR images of the muscles without adipose tissue infiltration were manually segmented in 3-D medical images.

resultsSymptomatic muscle atrophy was confirmed in only over 50% of LBLP subjects (gluteus maximus (p<0.001), gluteus minimus (p<0.01) and piriformis (p<0.05)). The ICC values indicated that the inter-rater reproducibility was greater than 0.90 for all measurements (LBLP and healthy subjects), except for the measurement of the right gluteus medius muscle in LBLP patients, which was equal to 0.848.

conclusionMore than 50% of LBLP subjects presented symptomatic gluteus maximus, gluteus minimus and piriformis muscle atrophy. 3-D manual segmentation reliably measured muscle volume in all the measured pelvic muscles in both healthy and LBLP subjects. To answer the question of what kind of muscle atrophy is indicative of radicular or non-radicular pain further studies are required.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalLegMagnetic Resonance ImagingCase-Control StudiesHumansLow Back PainMuscle, SkeletalNeurologic ExaminationOrgan SizePelvisReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID27459688
PMCPMC4961367
OpenAlexW2502889967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.