Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27459390›Full record

ArticleBrain and language2016

The neural circuits recruited for the production of signs and fingerspelled words.

Karen Emmorey, Sonya Mehta, Stephen McCullough, Thomas J Grabowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and language, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Fingerspelling and Its Role in Translanguaging.Languages (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The role of the superior parietal lobule in lexical processing of sign language: Insights from fMRI and TMS.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Pre-output Language Monitoring in Sign Production.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karen EmmoreySan Diego State University, United States. Electronic address: kemmorey@mail.sdsu.edu.
Sonya MehtaUniversity of Washington, United States.
Stephen McCulloughSan Diego State University, United States.
Thomas J GrabowskiUniversity of Washington, United States.

Funding

Language, Modality and the BrainR01DC010997 · NIDCD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KAREN EMMOREY · 2010 to 2026
$8.6M
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterU54HD083091 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GURALNICK, MICHAEL J · 2014 to 2019
$7.9M
Neural Systems Underlying Sign Language ProductionR01DC006708 · NIDCD · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI EMMOREY, KAREN · 2005 to 2009
$2.1M
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083091NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC006708NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Signing differs from typical non-linguistic hand actions because movements are not visually guided, finger movements are complex (particularly for fingerspelling), and signs are not produced as holistic gestures. We used positron emission tomography to investigate the neural circuits involved in the production of American Sign Language (ASL). Different types of signs (one-handed (articulated in neutral space), two-handed (neutral space), and one-handed body-anchored signs) were elicited by asking deaf native signers to produce sign translations of English words. Participants also fingerspelled (one-handed) printed English words. For the baseline task, participants indicated whether a word contained a descending letter. Fingerspelling engaged ipsilateral motor cortex and cerebellar cortex in contrast to both one-handed signs and the descender baseline task, which may reflect greater timing demands and complexity of handshape sequences required for fingerspelling. Greater activation in the visual word form area was also observed for fingerspelled words compared to one-handed signs. Body-anchored signs engaged bilateral superior parietal cortex to a greater extent than the descender baseline task and neutral space signs, reflecting the motor control and proprioceptive monitoring required to direct the hand toward a specific location on the body. Less activation in parts of the motor circuit was observed for two-handed signs compared to one-handed signs, possibly because, for half of the signs, handshape and movement goals were spread across the two limbs. Finally, the conjunction analysis comparing each sign type with the descender baseline task revealed common activation in the supramarginal gyrus bilaterally, which we interpret as reflecting phonological retrieval and encoding processes.

Indexed as

Brain MappingGesturesNeural PathwaysPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesSign LanguageAdultDeafnessFemaleHumansLinguisticsMaleParietal LobePositron-Emission TomographyYoung AdultFingerspellingLexical productionPositron emission tomographySign language

Identifiers

PMID27459390
PMCPMC5002375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.