Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27459237›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Stimulating Influenza Vaccination via Prosocial Motives.

Meng Li, Eric G Taylor, Katherine E Atkins, Gretchen B Chapman, Alison P Galvani

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04960228 (Enhancing COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions by Eliciting Prosocial Altruistic Motives), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04960228 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Enhancing COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions by Eliciting Prosocial Altruistic Motives: Evaluating the Efficacy of a Brief Video-Based Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorZeev RosbergerRan2021 to 2021Enrolled2,097ConditionsVaccine RefusalArmsAltruism Video, COVID-19 Informational Text
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Warming up cool cooperators.Nature human behaviour · 2023
    Article
  19. Facilitators of and barriers to COVID-19 vaccination in Grenada: a qualitative study.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Meng LiDepartment of Health and Behavioral Sciences, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8810-539X
Eric G TaylorCenter for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Katherine E AtkinsCenter for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Gretchen B ChapmanDepartment of Psychology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States of America.
Alison P GalvaniCenter for Infectious Disease Modeling and Analysis, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Yale University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Evaluating the social influences that impact vaccination decisionsU01GM105627 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GALVANI, ALISON P · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS U01 GM105627
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAmericans do not vaccinate nearly enough against Influenza (flu) infection, despite severe health and economic burden of influenza. Younger people are disproportionately responsible for transmission, but do not suffer severely from the flu. Thus, to achieve herd immunity, prosocial motivation needs to be a partial driver of vaccination decisions. Past research has not established the causal role of prosociality in flu vaccination, and the current research evaluates such causal relationship by experimentally eliciting prosociality through messages about flu victims.

methodsIn an experimental study, we described potential flu victims who would suffer from the decision of others to not vaccinate to 3952 Internet participants across eight countries. We measured sympathy, general prosociality, and vaccination intentions. The study included two identifiable victim conditions (one with an elderly victim and another with a young victim), an unidentified victim condition, and a no message condition.

resultsWe found that any of the three messages increased flu vaccination intentions. Moreover, this effect was mediated by enhanced prosocial motives, and was stronger among people who were historical non-vaccinators. In addition, younger victim elicited greater sympathy, and describing identifiable victims increased general sympathy and prosocial motives.

conclusionsThese findings provide direct experimental evidence on the causal role of prosocial motives in flu vaccination, by showing that people can be prompted to vaccinate for the sake of benefiting others.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMotivationAdultAge FactorsFemaleHumansInfluenza, HumanMaleMass VaccinationMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27459237
PMCPMC4961402
OpenAlexW2482537185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.