Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27458814›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2016

Lingual palpation for porcine cysticercosis: a rapid epidemiological tool for estimating prevalence and community risk in Africa.

Helen L Guyatt, Eric M Fèvre

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Helen L GuyattKimetrica Limited, Nairobi, Kenya. helen.guyatt@kimetrica.com.
Eric M FèvreInstitute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, Neston, UK.
Multimedia University of Kenya · KEUniversity of Liverpool · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L019019/1Medical Research Council G1100783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the association between the prevalence of tongue cyst-positive and antigen-positive pigs across different settings in Africa, to evaluate whether examining pigs for cysts could be used as a rapid surveillance tool for identifying geographical areas with a higher probability of high transmission of cysticercosis.

methodsPublished data were collated from 26 study sites across Africa that reported the prevalence of porcine cysticercosis by both lingual and serological examinations. The study sites were located in 10 countries across Africa.

resultsSeroprevalence rates ranged from 4% to 41%. Despite the varied study sites, the relationship between the two variables was highly consistent and suggests identification of tongue cysts may be useful for cysticercosis surveillance. We found that all areas with more than 10% of pigs having cysts in their tongues had at least 30% seroprevalence (PPV of 100%), although this cut-off is less reliable at predicting that an area is of low transmission (NPV of 84%).

conclusionAssessing the prevalence of tongue cyst-positive pigs is a potential rapid epidemiological tool for identifying areas at high risk of cysticercosis, although further refinement and validation is required using standardised data sets.

Indexed as

AfricaAnimalsCysticercosisPalpationSeroepidemiologic StudiesSwineSwine DiseasesTongueAfricaÁfricaAfriqueCisticercosiscontrolcontrôlecysticercoseCysticercosisepidemiologíaépidémiologieEpidemiologyprévalence du kyste de la langueprevalencia de quistes lingualesseroprevalenceSero-prevalenciasurveillanceTaenia soliumtongue cyst prevalencevigilancia

Identifiers

PMID27458814
PMCPMC5053228
OpenAlexW2476665419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.