ReviewWorld journal of orthopedics2016
Prenatal diagnosis and assessment of congenital spinal anomalies: Review for prenatal counseling.
Review in World journal of orthopedics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shifting Burden of Neural Tube Defects from Early-Life Mortality to an Aging Population Living with Disability - China, 1990-2023.China CDC weekly · 2026Article
- Diagnostic techniques and detailed assessment of fetal intraspinal lipoma: a prospective study.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
- From Gastrulation to Malformation: Understanding the Embryology of Split Cord Malformations for Obstetric Practice.Fetal diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Long-Term Outcomes of Prenatally Diagnosed Fetal Hemivertebra: A 15-Year Single-Center Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Congenital Anterior Dislocation of the Sacrococcygeal Bone in a Newborn.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of spinal cord neural tube defects: A prospective study.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Perspectives on urological care in spina bifida patients.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2021Review
- Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal musculoskeletal system.Pediatric radiology · 2020Review
- Severe myelomeningocele in the fourth pregnancy of a 29-year-old woman: a case report.Romanian journal of morphology and embryology = Revue roumaine de morphologie et embryologieArticle
- Epidemiological and diagnostic characteristics of scoliosis in children in a single tertiary centre in Abidjan.African journal of paediatric surgery : AJPSArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The last two decades have seen continuous advances in prenatal ultrasonography and in utero magnetic resonance imaging. These technologies have increasingly enabled the identification of various spinal pathologies during early stages of gestation. The purpose of this paper is to review the range of fetal spine anomalies and their management, with the goal of improving the clinician's ability to counsel expectant parents prenatally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.