Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27458473›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2016

Comparison between Arabidopsis and Rice for Main Pathways of K(+) and Na(+) Uptake by Roots.

Manuel Nieves-Cordones, Vicente Martínez, Begoña Benito, Francisco Rubio

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
24.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The high-affinity KTransgenic research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Inverse regulation of SOS1 and HKT1 protein localization and stability by SOS3/CBL4 inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A NovelPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Inhibitory Effects of the Addition of KNOBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Manuel Nieves-CordonesBiochimie et Physiologie Moléculaire des Plantes, Institut de Biologie Intégrative des Plantes, UMR 5004 CNRS/UMR 0386 INRA/Montpellier SupAgro/Université Montpellier 2 Montpellier, France.
Vicente MartínezDepartamento de Nutrición Vegetal, Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Murcia, Spain.
Begoña BenitoCentro de Biotecnología y Genómica de Plantas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Madrid, Spain.
Francisco RubioDepartamento de Nutrición Vegetal, Centro de Edafología y Biología Aplicada del Segura - Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Murcia, Spain.
Centre for Plant Biotechnology and Genomics · ESInstitut des Sciences des Plantes de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

K(+) is an essential macronutrient for plants. It is acquired by specific uptake systems located in roots. Although the concentrations of K(+) in the soil solution are widely variable, K(+) nutrition is secured by uptake systems that exhibit different affinities for K(+). Two main systems have been described for root K(+) uptake in several species: the high-affinity HAK5-like transporter and the inward-rectifier AKT1-like channel. Other unidentified systems may be also involved in root K(+) uptake, although they only seem to operate when K(+) is not limiting. The use of knock-out lines has allowed demonstrating their role in root K(+) uptake in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant adaptation to the different K(+) supplies relies on the finely tuned regulation of these systems. Low K(+)-induced transcriptional up-regulation of the genes encoding HAK5-like transporters occurs through a signal cascade that includes changes in the membrane potential of root cells and increases in ethylene and reactive oxygen species concentrations. Activation of AKT1 channels occurs through phosphorylation by the CIPK23/CBL1 complex. Recently, activation of the Arabidopsis HAK5 by the same complex has been reported, pointing to CIPK23/CBL as a central regulator of the plant's adaptation to low K(+). Na(+) is not an essential plant nutrient but it may be beneficial for some plants. At low concentrations, Na(+) improves growth, especially under K(+) deficiency. Thus, high-affinity Na(+) uptake systems have been described that belong to the HKT and HAK families of transporters. At high concentrations, typical of saline environments, Na(+) accumulates in plant tissues at high concentrations, producing alterations that include toxicity, water deficit and K(+) deficiency. Data concerning pathways for Na(+) uptake into roots under saline conditions are still scarce, although several possibilities have been proposed. The apoplast is a significant pathway for Na(+) uptake in rice grown under salinity conditions, but in other plant species different mechanisms involving non-selective cation channels or transporters are under discussion.

Indexed as

Arabidopsispotassiumricerootssodiumuptake

Identifiers

PMID27458473
PMCPMC4932104
OpenAlexW2469323502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.