Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27458439›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

Industrial Acetogenic Biocatalysts: A Comparative Metabolic and Genomic Analysis.

Frank R Bengelsdorf, Anja Poehlein, Sonja Linder, Catarina Erz, Tim Hummel, Sabrina Hoffmeister, Rolf Daniel, Peter Dürre

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Recent progress in engineeringSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  8. Probing efficient microbial COMicrobial biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The potential of CONature communications · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Comparison of Syngas-FermentingMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Frank R BengelsdorfInstitut für Mikrobiologie und Biotechnologie, Universität Ulm Ulm, Germany.
Anja PoehleinGenomic and Applied Microbiology and Göttingen Genomics Laboratory, Georg-August University Göttingen Göttingen, Germany.
Sonja LinderInstitut für Mikrobiologie und Biotechnologie, Universität Ulm Ulm, Germany.
Catarina ErzInstitut für Mikrobiologie und Biotechnologie, Universität Ulm Ulm, Germany.
Tim HummelInstitut für Mikrobiologie und Biotechnologie, Universität Ulm Ulm, Germany.
Sabrina HoffmeisterInstitut für Mikrobiologie und Biotechnologie, Universität Ulm Ulm, Germany.
Rolf DanielGenomic and Applied Microbiology and Göttingen Genomics Laboratory, Georg-August University Göttingen Göttingen, Germany.
Peter DürreInstitut für Mikrobiologie und Biotechnologie, Universität Ulm Ulm, Germany.
Universität Ulm · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthesis gas (syngas) fermentation by anaerobic acetogenic bacteria employing the Wood-Ljungdahl pathway is a bioprocess for production of biofuels and biocommodities. The major fermentation products of the most relevant biocatalytic strains (Clostridium ljungdahlii, C. autoethanogenum, C. ragsdalei, and C. coskatii) are acetic acid and ethanol. A comparative metabolic and genomic analysis using the mentioned biocatalysts might offer targets for metabolic engineering and thus improve the production of compounds apart from ethanol. Autotrophic growth and product formation of the four wild type (WT) strains were compared in uncontrolled batch experiments. The genomes of C. ragsdalei and C. coskatii were sequenced and the genome sequences of all four biocatalytic strains analyzed in comparative manner. Growth and product spectra (acetate, ethanol, 2,3-butanediol) of C. autoethanogenum, C. ljungdahlii, and C. ragsdalei were rather similar. In contrast, C. coskatii produced significantly less ethanol and its genome sequence lacks two genes encoding aldehyde:ferredoxin oxidoreductases (AOR). Comparative genome sequence analysis of the four WT strains revealed high average nucleotide identity (ANI) of C. ljungdahlii and C. autoethanogenum (99.3%) and C. coskatii (98.3%). In contrast, C. ljungdahlii WT and C. ragsdalei WT showed an ANI-based similarity of only 95.8%. Additionally, recombinant C. ljungdahlii strains were constructed that harbor an artificial acetone synthesis operon (ASO) consisting of the following genes: adc, ctfA, ctfB, and thlA (encoding acetoacetate decarboxylase, acetoacetyl-CoA:acetate/butyrate:CoA-transferase subunits A and B, and thiolase) under the control of thlA promoter (P thlA ) from C. acetobutylicum or native pta-ack promoter (P pta-ack ) from C. ljungdahlii. Respective recombinant strains produced 2-propanol rather than acetone, due to the presence of a NADPH-dependent primary-secondary alcohol dehydrogenase that converts acetone to 2-propanol. Furthermore, the ClosTron(TM) system was used to construct an adhE1 integration mutant. These results provide extensive insights into genetic features of industrially relevant bacterial biocatalysts and expand the toolbox for metabolic engineering of acetogenic bacteria able to ferment syngas.

Indexed as

C. autoethanogenumC. coskatiiClostridium ljungdahliiC. ragsdaleimetabolic engineeringsyngas fermentationsynthesis gasWood-Ljungdahl pathway

Identifiers

PMID27458439
PMCPMC4935695
OpenAlexW2463416766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.