Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27458357›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2016

Early Blindness Results in Developmental Plasticity for Auditory Motion Processing within Auditory and Occipital Cortex.

Fang Jiang, G Christopher Stecker, Geoffrey M Boynton, Ione Fine

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. The perception of auditory motion in sighted and early blind individuals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  10. Do you hear what I see? How do early blind individuals experience object motion?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Fang JiangDepartment of Psychology, University of Nevada Reno, NV, USA.
G Christopher SteckerDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Nashville, TN, USA.
Geoffrey M BoyntonDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA.
Ione FineDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · USUniversity of Nevada, Reno · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

The Effects of Visual DeprivationR01EY014645 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FINE, IONE · 2004 to 2021
$5.3M
Cross-modal motion responses in blind and deaf humansR00EY023268 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI JIANG, FANG · 2015 to 2017
$747k
Cross-modal motion responses in blind and deaf humansK99EY023268 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JIANG, FANG · 2013 to 2014
$191k
NEI NIH HHS K99 EY023268NEI NIH HHS R00 EY023268NEI NIH HHS R01 EY014645
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early blind subjects exhibit superior abilities for processing auditory motion, which are accompanied by enhanced BOLD responses to auditory motion within hMT+ and reduced responses within right planum temporale (rPT). Here, by comparing BOLD responses to auditory motion in hMT+ and rPT within sighted controls, early blind, late blind, and sight-recovery individuals, we were able to separately examine the effects of developmental and adult visual deprivation on cortical plasticity within these two areas. We find that both the enhanced auditory motion responses in hMT+ and the reduced functionality in rPT are driven by the absence of visual experience early in life; neither loss nor recovery of vision later in life had a discernable influence on plasticity within these areas. Cortical plasticity as a result of blindness has generally be presumed to be mediated by competition across modalities within a given cortical region. The reduced functionality within rPT as a result of early visual loss implicates an additional mechanism for cross modal plasticity as a result of early blindness-competition across different cortical areas for functional role.

Indexed as

auditory motionearly blindnessfMRIhMT+late blindnessvisual deprivation

Identifiers

PMID27458357
PMCPMC4932114
OpenAlexW2464304991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.