Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27457790›Full record

Trial reportWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP2017

Efficacy and tolerability of a polysaccharide-resin-honey based cough syrup as compared to carbocysteine syrup for children with colds: a randomized, single-blinded, multicenter study.

Herman Avner Cohen, Moshe Hoshen, Shmuel Gur, Arie Bahir, Yoseph Laks, Hannah Blau

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in World journal of pediatrics : WJP, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03218696 (A Randomized, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of a Cough Syrup Containing Specific Plant Extracts), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03218696 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of a Cough Syrup Containing Specific Plant Extracts (Poliflav M.A.) and Honey Versus Placebo in Cough Due to Upper Respiratory Tract Infection

TypeinterventionalSponsorClalit Health ServicesRan2018 to 2018Enrolled80ConditionsCough, Acute Upper Respiratory Tract InfectionArmsCough Syrup for adults and children, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Honey for acute cough in children - a systematic review.European journal of pediatrics · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Oral antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations for the common cold.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Honey for acute cough in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Herman Avner Cohen, P.O.Box 187, 56000, Yehud, Israel. hermanc@post.tau.ac.il.
Moshe HoshenClalit Research Institute, Chief Physician's Office, Clalit Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Shmuel GurSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Arie BahirSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Yoseph LaksSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Hannah BlauSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Tel Aviv University · ILClalit Health Services · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAvailable pediatric treatments for acute cough are limited by lack of demonstrated efficacy. The objective of this trial is to compare the effects of a polysaccharide-resin-honey based cough syrup, and carbocysteine syrups on nocturnal and daytime cough associated with childhood upper respiratory tract infections (URIs).

methodsUsing a single-blind randomization design, the study recruited children from 4 general pediatric community clinics. Participants included 150 children aged 2 to 5 years with an URI, nocturnal and daytime cough and illness duration of ≤7 days. To be eligible, children had to be free of medication on the day before presentation. A survey was administered to parents on 4 consecutive days beginning from the day of presentation in clinic. Children received the study preparation on the first evening and then 3 times per day for 3 further days. Main outcome measures were cough frequency, cough severity, bothersome nature of cough, and quality of sleep for both child and parent.

resultsBoth preparations were well tolerated and cough improved over the study period. After one night and on all survey days, there was a significantly better result for polysaccharide-resin-honey (P<0.05) for all the main outcome measures. The trend of improvement over the 4 days was steeper for polysaccharide-resin-honey (P<0.05) with regards to all cough parameters.

conclusionsBoth polysaccharide-resin-honey and carbocysteine cough syrups were well tolerated in children over 2 years of age. The polysaccharide-resin-honey syrup was associated with a more rapid and greater improvement in all clinical cough symptoms measured, beginning from the first night of therapy. Both nocturnal and daytime cough improved, as did sleep quality for both children and parents.

Indexed as

Antitussive AgentsCarbocysteineChildChild, PreschoolCommon ColdCoughDextromethorphanExpectorantsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIsraelMaleRespiratory Tract InfectionsRisk AssessmentSingle-Blind MethodAntitussive AgentsCarbocysteineDextromethorphanExpectorantschildrencoughupper respiratory tract infection

Identifiers

PMID27457790
OpenAlexW2504080633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.