ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2016
Older Cancer Patients' User Experiences With Web-Based Health Information Tools: A Think-Aloud Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Digital Health Interventions to Improve Mental Health in Patients With Cancer: Umbrella Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Tailored Web-Based Information for Younger and Older Patients with Cancer: Randomized Controlled Trial of a Preparatory Educational Intervention on Patient Outcomes.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Trial
- Symptom management in cancer care: An evolutionary concept analysis for a digitally enabled collaborative framework.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Review
- Navigating Home Care Packages: A Content and Usability Analysis of Consumer-Facing Information on Aged Care Provider Websites.Australasian journal on ageing · 2026Article
- Article
- Exploring factors affecting the adoption and use of digital health technologies among older adults with cancer: A qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Exploring Older Adult's Views of the Age-Inclusivity of Physical Activity Websites Using the Think Aloud Method: Qualitative Analysis.JMIR aging · 2025Article
- Cognitive interviewing for assessing the content validity of older-person specific outcome measures for quality assessment and economic evaluation: a scoping review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- How Patients With Cancer Use the Internet to Search for Health Information: Scenario-Based Think-Aloud Study.JMIR infodemiology · 2025Article
- Usability Evaluation Methods Used in Electronic Discharge Summaries: Literature Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Review
- Cancer Patients' Perspectives and Requirements of Digital Health Technologies: A Scoping Literature Review.Cancers · 2024Article
- A Technological Tool Aimed at Self-Care in Patients With Multimorbidity: Cross-Sectional Usability Study.JMIR human factors · 2024Observational
- Parents' User Experience Accessing and Using a Web-Based Map of COVID-19 Recommendations for Health Decision-Making: Qualitative Descriptive Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Applications of digital health approaches for cardiometabolic diseases prevention and management in the Western Pacific region.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Review
- Supportive Digital Health Service During Cancer Chemotherapy: Single-Arm Before-and-After Feasibility Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Usability of an artificially intelligence-powered triage platform for adult ophthalmic emergencies: a mixed methods study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Exploring the experiences and priorities of women with a diagnosis of ovarian cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- An education resource for human papillomavirus oropharyngeal cancer patients: think-aloud interviews.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023Article
- The telemedicine community readiness model-successful telemedicine implementation and scale-up.Frontiers in digital health · 2023Article
- Message Frame-Tailoring in Digital Health Communication: Intervention Redesign and Usability Testing.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth information is increasingly presented on the Internet. Several Web design guidelines for older Web users have been proposed; however, these guidelines are often not applied in website development. Furthermore, although we know that older individuals use the Internet to search for health information, we lack knowledge on how they use and evaluate Web-based health information.
objectiveThis study evaluates user experiences with existing Web-based health information tools among older (≥ 65 years) cancer patients and survivors and their partners. The aim was to gain insight into usability issues and the perceived usefulness of cancer-related Web-based health information tools.
methodsWe conducted video-recorded think-aloud observations for 7 Web-based health information tools, specifically 3 websites providing cancer-related information, 3 Web-based question prompt lists (QPLs), and 1 values clarification tool, with colorectal cancer patients or survivors (n=15) and their partners (n=8) (median age: 73; interquartile range 70-79). Participants were asked to think aloud while performing search, evaluation, and application tasks using the Web-based health information tools.
resultsOverall, participants perceived Web-based health information tools as highly useful and indicated a willingness to use such tools. However, they experienced problems in terms of usability and perceived usefulness due to difficulties in using navigational elements, shortcomings in the layout, a lack of instructions on how to use the tools, difficulties with comprehensibility, and a large amount of variety in terms of the preferred amount of information. Although participants frequently commented that it was easy for them to find requested information, we observed that the large majority of the participants were not able to find it.
conclusionsOverall, older cancer patients appreciate and are able to use cancer information websites. However, this study shows the importance of maintaining awareness of age-related problems such as cognitive and functional decline and navigation difficulties with this target group in mind. The results of this study can be used to design usable and useful Web-based health information tools for older (cancer) patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.