Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27457639›Full record

ArticleDiabetes care2016

"Prediabetes": Are There Problems With This Label? No, We Need Heightened Awareness of This Condition!

William T Cefalu

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The Emerging Role of Prediabetes and Its Management: Focus on L-Arginine and a Survey in Clinical Practice.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Machine learning for diabetes clinical decision support: a review.Advances in computational intelligence · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Prediabetes Deserves More Attention: A Review.Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Type 2 Diabetes: When Does It Start?Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

William T CefaluPennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA cefaluwt@pbrc.edu.
Louisiana State University · US

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Peter Todd Katzmarzyk · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
Pregnane and Glycosides and Obesity/llya RaskinP50AT002776 · NCCIH · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI RIBNICKY, DAVID M · 2005 to 2019
$24.9M
NCCIH NIH HHS P50 AT002776NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The category of "prediabetes" defined by the American Diabetes Association comprises a range of intermediate hyperglycemia based on fasting or 2-h postload glucose or on HbA1c Over the recent past, the "cut points" identifying this stage have changed, i.e., a lower fasting glucose level is used. On one hand, it can be argued that the change to a lower cut point identifies a group of individuals still at higher risk and provides heightened awareness for a condition associated with higher risk for cardiovascular disease. In addition, identification of individuals at this stage may represent a chance of earlier intervention in the disease. However, the argument against this definition of prediabetes is that it disguises the differences in the three subcategories and creates problems in interpreting observations on interventions and outcomes. In addition, it can be argued that the enormous numbers of people identified with the criteria far exceeds the capacity of health care systems to respond through individual care, particularly without evidence that interventions benefit any category other than impaired glucose tolerance. Thus, there does not appear to be consensus on the definition using the cut points identified. Controversy also remains as to whether there are glycemic metrics beyond HbA1c that can be used in addition to HbA1c to help assess risk of an individual developing diabetes complications. Given the current controversy, a Point-Counterpoint debate on this issue is provided herein. In the preceding point narrative, Dr. Yudkin provides his argument that there are significant problems with this label. In the counterpoint narrative below, Dr. Cefalu argues that the cut points are appropriate and do provide useful and important information in trying to reduce the future burden of diabetes.-William T. CefaluEditor in Chief, Diabetes Care.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeBlood GlucoseGlucose IntoleranceGlycated HemoglobinHumansPrediabetic StateRisk FactorsBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobin

Identifiers

PMID27457639
PMCPMC4955936
OpenAlexW2489883502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.