Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27457241›Full record

ArticleBMC ophthalmology2016

Corneal biomechanical changes in eyes with small incision lenticule extraction and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis.

Ihab Mohamed Osman, Hany Ahmed Helaly, Moones Abdalla, Mohsen Abou Shousha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Hyperopic keratorefractive lenticule extraction.Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Complications of small incision lenticule extraction.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ihab Mohamed OsmanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Hany Ahmed HelalyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. hany209209@yahoo.com.
Moones AbdallaRoayah Vision Correction Center, Alexandria, Egypt.
Mohsen Abou ShoushaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvaluating the corneal biomechanical changes using the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in eyes with incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

methodsThis is a retrospective study that included 50 eyes equally divided into two groups. The first group included eyes that underwent SMILE procedure using VisuMax® 500 kHz laser system (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) and the second group included eyes that underwent LASIK procedure using the EX500 Allegretto excimer laser platform (Wavelight GmbH, Erlangen, Germany). The Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and the Corvis ST (CST) measured the corneal biomechanical changes before and after the procedures.

resultsThe ORA showed significant decrease of corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) in both groups postoperatively. The percentage of change of CH and CRF were found to be significantly higher in group II. There was no significant difference in the IOP with the ORA and the CST pre and postoperatively in either group. Using CST, the deformation amplitude and HC peak distances increased significantly in both groups. It was also noted that the mean percentage of change of the deformation amplitude was nearly five times higher in group II than group I.

conclusionBoth LASIK and SMILE substantially decreased the corneal biomechanical properties with greater reduction in the LASIK group.

Indexed as

AdultBiomechanical PhenomenaCorneaCorneal Surgery, LaserFemaleHumansIntraocular PressureKeratomileusis, Laser In SituMaleMyopiaRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultBiomechanicsCorvis STLASIKSMILE

Identifiers

PMID27457241
PMCPMC4960872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.