Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27457137›Full record

ArticleAcademic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine2016

Development and Testing of Shared Decision Making Interventions for Use in Emergency Care: A Research Agenda.

Edward R Melnick, Marc A Probst, Elizabeth Schoenfeld, Sean P Collins, Maggie Breslin, Cheryl Walsh, Nathan Kuppermann, Pat Dunn, Benjamin S Abella, Dowin Boatright and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Shared Decision Making for Syncope in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2020
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Cognitive Interviews With Emergency Physicians to Understand Disposition Decisions With People With Dementia With Borderline Cases.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Research priority setting in emergency care: A scoping review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Development of an App to Facilitate Communication and Shared Decision-making With Parents of Febrile Infants ≤ 60 Days Old.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Shared Decision Making in Patients With Suspected Uncomplicated Ureterolithiasis: A Decision Aid Development Study.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Qualitative Analysis of Patients' Perceptions of Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: "Let Me Know I Have a Choice".Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2018
    Article
  19. Development of a Patient Decision Aid for Syncope in the Emergency Department: the SynDA Tool.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Edward R MelnickDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Marc A ProbstDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
Elizabeth SchoenfeldDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, MA.
Sean P CollinsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
Maggie BreslinSchool of Visual Arts, New York, NY.
Cheryl WalshPatient Representative, Stockbridge, GA.
Nathan KuppermannDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA.
Pat DunnPatient and Healthcare Innovations and Center for Health Technology and Innovation, American Heart Association, Dallas, TX.
Benjamin S AbellaDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Dowin BoatrightDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Erik P HessDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN.
Yale University · USAmerican Heart Association · USBaystate Medical Center · USClinical Research Atlanta · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMayo Clinic · USSchool of Visual Arts · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

Clinical Decision Support for Mild Traumatic Brain InjuryK08HS021271 · AHRQ · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MELNICK, EDWARD ROBERT · 2013 to 2017
$772k
SYNDICARE: Syncope Decision Aid for Emergency CareK23HL132052 · NHLBI · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI PROBST, MARC · 2016 to 2019
$678k
Physician Perspectives Regarding the Use of Shared Decision-Making in the Emergency DepartmentR03HS024311 · AHRQ · BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. · PI SCHOENFELD, ELIZABETH MAE · 2015 to 2016
$83k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS021271AHRQ HHS R03 HS024311NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL132052
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decision aids are evidenced-based tools designed to increase patient understanding of medical options and possible outcomes, facilitate conversation between patients and clinicians, and improve patient engagement. Decision aids have been used for shared decision making (SDM) interventions outside of the ED setting for more than a decade. Their use in the ED has only recently begun to be studied. This article provides background on this topic and the conclusions of the 2016 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference SDM in practice work group regarding "Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department: Development of a Policy-Relevant, Patient-Centered Research Agenda." The goal was to determine a prioritized research agenda for the development and testing of SDM interventions for use in emergency care that was most important to patients, clinicians, caregivers, and other key stakeholders. Using the nominal group technique, the consensus working group proposed prioritized research questions in six key domains: 1) content (i.e., clinical scenario or decision area), 2) level of evidence available, 3) tool design strategies, 4) risk communication, 5) stakeholders, and 6) outcomes.

Indexed as

Decision MakingDecision Support TechniquesPatient ParticipationCommunicationEmergency MedicineEmergency Service, HospitalHumansPatient-Centered CareRisk

Identifiers

PMID27457137
PMCPMC5145730
OpenAlexW2491222960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.