Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27456846›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2016

Paternal programming of breast cancer risk in daughters in a rat model: opposing effects of animal- and plant-based high-fat diets.

Camile Castilho Fontelles, Luiza Nicolosi Guido, Mariana Papaléo Rosim, Fábia de Oliveira Andrade, Lu Jin, Jessica Inchauspe, Vanessa Cardoso Pires, Inar Alves de Castro, Leena Hilakivi-Clarke, Sonia de Assis and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Paternal and/or Maternal Blackberry (Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Mitochondrial dysfunction in pregnancy loss: a review.Molecular and cellular biochemistry · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Epigenetic Biomarkers for Environmental Exposures and Personalized Breast Cancer Prevention.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Camile Castilho FontellesDepartment of Food and Experimental Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes 580, Bloco 14, São Paulo, SP, 05508-000, Brazil.
Luiza Nicolosi GuidoDepartment of Food and Experimental Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes 580, Bloco 14, São Paulo, SP, 05508-000, Brazil.
Mariana Papaléo RosimDepartment of Food and Experimental Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes 580, Bloco 14, São Paulo, SP, 05508-000, Brazil.
Fábia de Oliveira AndradeDepartment of Food and Experimental Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes 580, Bloco 14, São Paulo, SP, 05508-000, Brazil.
Lu JinGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Jessica InchauspeGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Vanessa Cardoso PiresDepartment of Food and Experimental Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes 580, Bloco 14, São Paulo, SP, 05508-000, Brazil.
Inar Alves de CastroDepartment of Food and Experimental Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes 580, Bloco 14, São Paulo, SP, 05508-000, Brazil.
Leena Hilakivi-ClarkeGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Sonia de AssisGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
Thomas Prates OngDepartment of Food and Experimental Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of São Paulo, Avenida Professor Lineu Prestes 580, Bloco 14, São Paulo, SP, 05508-000, Brazil. tong@usp.br.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer CenterBrf (Brazil) · BR

Funding

Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN W BYERS · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
Transgenerational effects of maternal high fat diet during pregnancy on breast caR01CA164384 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI HILAKIVI-CLARKE, LEENA A. · 2012 to 2015
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008NCI NIH HHS R01 CA164384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough males contribute half of the embryo's genome, only recently has interest begun to be directed toward the potential impact of paternal experiences on the health of offspring. While there is evidence that paternal malnutrition may increase offspring susceptibility to metabolic diseases, the influence of paternal factors on a daughter's breast cancer risk has been examined in few studies.

methodsMale Sprague-Dawley rats were fed, before and during puberty, either a lard-based (high in saturated fats) or a corn oil-based (high in n-6 polyunsaturated fats) high-fat diet (60 % of fat-derived energy). Control animals were fed an AIN-93G control diet (16 % of fat-derived energy). Their 50-day-old female offspring fed only a commercial diet were subjected to the classical model of mammary carcinogenesis based on 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene initiation, and mammary tumor development was evaluated. Sperm cells and mammary gland tissue were subjected to cellular and molecular analysis.

resultsCompared with female offspring of control diet-fed male rats, offspring of lard-fed male rats did not differ in tumor latency, growth, or multiplicity. However, female offspring of lard-fed male rats had increased elongation of the mammary epithelial tree, number of terminal end buds, and tumor incidence compared with both female offspring of control diet-fed and corn oil-fed male rats. Compared with female offspring of control diet-fed male rats, female offspring of corn oil-fed male rats showed decreased tumor growth but no difference regarding tumor incidence, latency, or multiplicity. Additionally, female offspring of corn oil-fed male rats had longer tumor latency as well as decreased tumor growth and multiplicity compared with female offspring of lard-fed male rats. Paternal consumption of animal- or plant-based high-fat diets elicited opposing effects, with lard rich in saturated fatty acids increasing breast cancer risk in offspring and corn oil rich in n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids decreasing it. These effects could be linked to alterations in microRNA expression in fathers' sperm and their daughters' mammary glands, and to modifications in breast cancer-related protein expression in this tissue.

conclusionsOur findings highlight the importance of paternal nutrition in affecting future generations' risk of developing breast cancer.

Indexed as

Paternal ExposurePrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsAnimalsApoptosisBreast NeoplasmsCell ProliferationCell Transformation, NeoplasticCluster AnalysisDiet, High-FatDisease Models, AnimalFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansLipidsMaleMammary Glands, AnimalLipidsMicroRNAsBreast cancerFemale offspringHigh-fat dietPaternal diet

Identifiers

PMID27456846
PMCPMC4960664
OpenAlexW2463175720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.