Trial reportDiabetes care2016
Health and Psychosocial Outcomes of a Telephonic Couples Behavior Change Intervention in Patients With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Diabetes care, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of eHealth Interventions for Adults with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Pooled it
- Effect of Telemetric Interventions on Glycated Hemoglobin A1c and Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Meta-Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Dyadic Coping in Couples Facing Chronic Physical Illness: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Pooled it
- Effect of Health Information Technologies on Glycemic Control Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.Current diabetes reports · 2018Pooled it
- Psychological interventions for diabetes-related distress in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials of social network interventions in type 2 diabetes.BMJ open · 2017Pooled it
- A Couple-Based Intervention for Chinese Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Outcomes from Partner2Lose: a randomized controlled trial to evaluate 24-month weight loss in a partner-assisted intervention.BMC public health · 2024Trial
- Changes in family involvement occasioned by FAMS mobile health intervention mediate changes in glycemic control over 12 months.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2022Trial
- Development and Implementation of Couple-Based Collaborative Management Model of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus for Community-Dwelling Chinese Older Adults: A Pilot Randomized Trial.Frontiers in public health · 2021Trial
- One Drop App With an Activity Tracker for Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Trial
- Two for one? Effects of a couples intervention on partners of persons with Type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2019Trial
- Using Mobile Health to Improve Social Support for Low-Income Latino Patients with Diabetes: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of the Feasibility Trial of TExT-MED + FANS.Diabetes technology & therapeutics · 2018Trial
- "Miscarried helping" in adults with Type 2 diabetes: Helping for Health Inventory-Couples.Families, systems & health : the journal of collaborative family healthcare · 2017Trial
- Effects of a Family-based Diabetes Intervention on Behavioral and Biological Outcomes for Mexican American Adults.The Diabetes educator · 2017Trial
- Does Length of Relationship or Gender Predict Response to Behavioral Diabetes Intervention?The Diabetes educator · 2017Trial
- 2026 EASD evidence-based clinical practice guideline for assessing and managing diabetes distress among adults with type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes.Diabetologia · 2026Article
- Interventions to reduce diabetes-related distress among adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.Diabetologia · 2026Article
- Beyond the Individual: Couple-Centered Health and Wellness Coaching to Address the Burden of Chronic Conditions.Preventing chronic disease · 2026Article
- Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Validation of the McMaster Family Assessment Device's General Functioning Subscale: A Cross-Sectional Study Among African Adults With Type 2 Diabetes.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare glycemic control and secondary outcomes of a 4-month telephonic couples behavioral intervention to individual intervention, and to education, for adults with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND
methodsA randomized trial with the following three arms: couples calls (CC) (n = 104); individual calls (IC) (n = 94); and diabetes education (DE) (n = 82). All arms had self-management education (two calls). CC and IC had 10 additional behavior change calls. CC addressed collaboration and relationships/communication. Participants consisted of 280 couples, among whom one partner had type 2 diabetes and an A1C level ≥7.5%. Blinded assessments occurred at 4, 8, and 12 months. The primary outcome was change in A1C; and secondary outcomes were BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, depressive symptoms, diabetes self-efficacy, and diabetes distress.
resultsPatients had a mean age of 56.8 years; 61.6% were male, and 30.4% were minorities. The baseline mean A1C level was 9.1%. Intention-to-treat analyses found significant A1C reductions for all (12 months: CC -0.47%, IC -0.52%, DE -0.57%), with no differences between arms. Preplanned within-arm analyses were stratified by baseline A1C tertiles: lowest tertile (7.5-8.2%), no change from baseline; middle tertile (8.3-9.2%), only CC led to significantly lower A1C level; and highest tertile (≥9.3%), significant improvement for all interventions. For BMI, CC showed significant improvement, and CC and DE led to decreased waist circumference. The IC group showed greater blood pressure improvement. Results for secondary psychosocial outcomes favored the CC group.
conclusionsIn adults with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes, a collaborative couples intervention resulted in significant, lasting improvement in A1C levels, obesity measures, and some psychosocial outcomes. For those with exceedingly high A1C levels, education alone was beneficial, but additional intervention is needed to achieve glycemic targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.