Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27456779›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary science2016

Epizootiological characteristics of viable bacteria and fungi in indoor air from porcine, chicken, or bovine husbandry confinement buildings.

Katharine Roque, Gyeong-Dong Lim, Ji-Hoon Jo, Kyung-Min Shin, Eun-Seob Song, Ravi Gautam, Chang-Yul Kim, Kyungsuk Lee, Seungwon Shin, Han-Sang Yoo and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Microorganisms · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Katharine RoqueDepartment of Occupational Health, College of Medical and Public Health Sciences, Catholic University of Daegu, Gyeongsan 38430, Korea.
Gyeong-Dong LimDepartment of Occupational Health, College of Medical and Public Health Sciences, Catholic University of Daegu, Gyeongsan 38430, Korea.
Ji-Hoon JoDepartment of Occupational Health, College of Medical and Public Health Sciences, Catholic University of Daegu, Gyeongsan 38430, Korea.
Kyung-Min ShinDepartment of Occupational Health, College of Medical and Public Health Sciences, Catholic University of Daegu, Gyeongsan 38430, Korea.
Eun-Seob SongDepartment of Occupational Health, College of Medical and Public Health Sciences, Catholic University of Daegu, Gyeongsan 38430, Korea.
Ravi GautamDepartment of Occupational Health, College of Medical and Public Health Sciences, Catholic University of Daegu, Gyeongsan 38430, Korea.
Chang-Yul KimDepartment of Occupational Health, College of Medical and Public Health Sciences, Catholic University of Daegu, Gyeongsan 38430, Korea.
Kyungsuk LeeNational Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Wanju 55365, Korea.
Seungwon ShinDepartment of Infectious Diseases and BK21 PLUS, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Han-Sang YooDepartment of Infectious Diseases and BK21 PLUS, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea.
Yong HeoDepartment of Occupational Health, College of Medical and Public Health Sciences, Catholic University of Daegu, Gyeongsan 38430, Korea.
Hyoung-Ah KimDepartment of Preventive Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Korea.
Catholic University of Daegu · KRSeoul National University · KRCatholic University of Korea · KRRural Development Administration · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microorganisms found in bioaerosols from animal confinement buildings not only foster the risk of spreading diseases among livestock buildings, but also pose health hazards to farm workers and nearby residents. This study identified the various microorganisms present in the air of swine, chicken, and cattle farms with different kinds of ventilation conditions in Korea. Microbial air samples were collected onto Petri dishes with bacterial or fungal growth media using a cascade impactor. Endotoxin levels in total dust were determined by the limulus amebocyte lysate kinetic QCL method. Prevalent Gram-positive bacteria were

Indexed as

Air MicrobiologyHousing, AnimalAir Pollution, IndoorAnimal HusbandryAnimalsBacteriaCattleChickensDustEndotoxinsFungiHumansOccupational ExposureRepublic of KoreaRisk AssessmentSus scrofaDustEndotoxinsairborne microorganismscattlechickensGram-negative bacteriaswine

Identifiers

PMID27456779
PMCPMC5204031
OpenAlexW2512621793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.