Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27456714›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Genetic variability in a frozen batch of MCF-7 cells invisible in routine authentication affecting cell function.

Andre Kleensang, Marguerite M Vantangoli, Shelly Odwin-DaCosta, Melvin E Andersen, Kim Boekelheide, Mounir Bouhifd, Albert J Fornace, Heng-Hong Li, Carolina B Livi, Samantha Madnick and 5 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. From vision toward best practices: EvaluatingFrontiers in toxicology · 2023
    Article
  12. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  13. Cytotoxic Potential of Bioactive Compounds fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Andre KleensangCenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD, USA.
Marguerite M VantangoliDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Shelly Odwin-DaCostaCenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD, USA.
Melvin E AndersenThe Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Kim BoekelheideDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Mounir BouhifdCenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD, USA.
Albert J FornaceDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular &Cellular Biology, and Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Heng-Hong LiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular &Cellular Biology, and Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Carolina B LiviAgilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA.
Samantha MadnickDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Alexandra MaertensCenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michael RosenbergAgilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA.
James D YagerDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Liang ZhaoCenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD, USA.
Thomas HartungCenter for Alternatives to Animal Testing (CAAT), Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USBrown University · USAgilent Technologies (United States) · USGeorgetown University · USGeorgetown University Medical Center · USThe Hamner Institutes for Health Sciences · US

Funding

Mapping the Human Toxome by Systems ToxicologyR01ES020750 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HARTUNG, THOMAS · 2011 to 2015
$6.0M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES020750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Common recommendations for cell line authentication, annotation and quality control fall short addressing genetic heterogeneity. Within the Human Toxome Project, we demonstrate that there can be marked cellular and phenotypic heterogeneity in a single batch of the human breast adenocarcinoma cell line MCF-7 obtained directly from a cell bank that are invisible with the usual cell authentication by short tandem repeat (STR) markers. STR profiling just fulfills the purpose of authentication testing, which is to detect significant cross-contamination and cell line misidentification. Heterogeneity needs to be examined using additional methods. This heterogeneity can have serious consequences for reproducibility of experiments as shown by morphology, estrogenic growth dose-response, whole genome gene expression and untargeted mass-spectroscopy metabolomics for MCF-7 cells. Using Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH), differences were traced back to genetic heterogeneity already in the cells from the original frozen vials from the same ATCC lot, however, STR markers did not differ from ATCC reference for any sample. These findings underscore the need for additional quality assurance in Good Cell Culture Practice and cell characterization, especially using other methods such as CGH to reveal possible genomic heterogeneity and genetic drifts within cell lines.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorComparative Genomic HybridizationGene Expression ProfilingGenetic MarkersGenetic VariationHumansMCF-7 CellsMicrosatellite RepeatsReproducibility of ResultsGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID27456714
PMCPMC4960662
OpenAlexW2493132014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.