Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27456513›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2016

Developmental Outcomes of Late Preterm Infants From Infancy to Kindergarten.

Prachi Shah, Niko Kaciroti, Blair Richards, Wonjung Oh, Julie C Lumeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cognitive and Learning Outcomes in Late Preterm Infants at School Age: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Household unmet basic needs in the first 1000 days and preterm birth status.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. [Neuropsychological development of late preterm infants and early term infants at the age of 1 year: a follow-up study].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Gastroschisis at school age: what do parents report?European journal of pediatrics · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Prachi ShahDivision of Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Center for Human Growth and Development, and prachis@umich.edu.
Niko KacirotiCenter for Human Growth and Development, and.
Blair RichardsCenter for Human Growth and Development, and.
Wonjung OhDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Human Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas.
Julie C LumengDivision of Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Center for Human Growth and Development, and Department of Nutritional Sciences, School of Public of Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and.

Funding

Developmental Trajectories of Late Preterm Infants Using an Ecological FrameworkK08HD078506 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHAH, PRACHI EDLAGAN · 2015 to 2018
$604k
NICHD NIH HHS K08 HD078506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare developmental outcomes of late preterm infants (34-36 weeks' gestation) with infants born at early term (37-38 weeks' gestation) and term (39-41 weeks' gestation), from infancy through kindergarten.

methodsSample included 1000 late preterm, 1800 early term, and 3200 term infants ascertained from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort. Direct assessments of development were performed at 9 and 24 months by using the Bayley Short Form-Research Edition T-scores and at preschool and kindergarten using the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study, Birth Cohort reading and mathematics θ scores. Maternal and infant characteristics were obtained from birth certificate data and parent questionnaires. After controlling for covariates, we compared mean developmental outcomes between late preterm and full-term groups in serial cross-sectional analyses at each timepoint using multilinear regression, with pairwise comparisons testing for group differences by gestational age categories.

resultsWith covariates controlled at all timepoints, at 9 months late preterm infants demonstrated less optimal developmental outcomes (T = 47.31) compared with infants born early term (T = 49.12) and term (T = 50.09) (P < .0001). This association was not seen at 24 months, (P = .66) but reemerged at preschool. Late preterm infants demonstrated less optimal scores in preschool reading (P = .0006), preschool mathematics (P = .0014), and kindergarten reading (P = .0007) compared with infants born at term gestation.

conclusionsAlthough late preterm infants demonstrate comparable developmental outcomes to full-term infants (early term and full-term gestation) at 24 months, they demonstrate less optimal reading outcomes at preschool and kindergarten timepoints. Ongoing developmental surveillance for late preterm infants is warranted into preschool and kindergarten.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentCase-Control StudiesChild, PreschoolCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureLinear ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleNeuropsychological TestsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27456513
PMCPMC4960722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.