Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27456363›Full record

ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2016

Reprogramming bladder cancer cells for studying cancer initiation and progression.

Banu Iskender, Kenan Izgi, Halit Canatan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Computational Network Analysis for Defining Transcriptional Programs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Bioprinted research models of urological malignancy.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Cellular Reprogramming-A Model for Melanoma Cellular Plasticity.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Current status in cancer cell reprogramming and its clinical implications.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2017
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Application of induced pluripotency in cancer studies.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Banu IskenderDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Melikgazi, 38039, Kayseri, Turkey. banu.iskender@yahoo.com.
Kenan IzgiBetul-Ziya Eren Genome and Stem Cell Centre, Erciyes University, Melikgazi, 38039, Kayseri, Turkey.
Halit CanatanDepartment of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Erciyes University, Melikgazi, 38039, Kayseri, Turkey.
Erciyes University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology is the forced expression of specific transcription factors in somatic cells resulting in transformation into self-renewing, pluripotent cells which possess the ability to differentiate into any type of cells in the human body. While malignant cells could also be reprogrammed into iPSC-like cells with lower efficiency due to the genetic and epigenetic barriers in cancer cells, only a limited number of cancer cell types could be successfully reprogrammed until today. In the present study, we aimed at reprogramming two bladder cancer cell lines HTB-9 and T24 using a non-integrating Sendai virus (SeV) system. We have generated six sub-clones using distinct combinations of four factors-OCT4, SOX2, KLF4 and c-MYC-in two bladder cancer cell lines. Only a single sub-clone, T24 transduced with 4Fs, gave rise to iPSC-like cells. Bladder cancer cell-derived T24 4F cells represent unique features of pluripotent cells such as epithelial-like morphology, colony-forming ability, expression of pluripotency-associated markers and bearing the ability to differentiate in vitro. This is the first study focusing on the reprogramming susceptibility of two different bladder cancer cell lines to nuclear reprogramming. Further molecular characterisation of T24 4F cells could provide a better insight for biomarker research in bladder carcinogenesis and could offer a valuable tool for the development of novel therapeutic approaches in bladder carcinoma.

Indexed as

Cell Transformation, NeoplasticCellular ReprogrammingBiomarkersCell Line, TumorCells, CulturedCell TransdifferentiationCellular Reprogramming TechniquesEmbryoid BodiesHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsKruppel-Like Factor 4Kruppel-Like Transcription FactorsOctamer Transcription Factor-3PhosphorylationProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycSignal TransductionBiomarkersKLF4 protein, humanKruppel-Like Factor 4Kruppel-Like Transcription FactorsOctamer Transcription Factor-3Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycSOXB1 Transcription FactorsTranscription FactorsBladder cancerHTB-9Induced pluripotent stem cellsPluripotencyReprogrammingT24

Identifiers

PMID27456363
OpenAlexW2476933032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.