Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27456327›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2016

Effectiveness and safety of treatments used for the management of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Souvik Mitra, Ivan D Florez, Maria E Tamayo, Dagfinn Aune, Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Areti-Angeliki Veroniki, Lehana Thabane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Effectiveness and Renal Functions Safety of Treatments Used for Neonates with Patent Ductus Arteriosus: A Prospective Cohort Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Souvik MitraDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Division of Neonatal Perinatal Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Ivan D FlorezDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Department of Pediatrics, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-0751-8932
Maria E TamayoDepartment of Pediatrics, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia.
Dagfinn AuneDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College, London, UK.
Lawrence MbuagbawDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Areti-Angeliki VeronikiKnowledge Translation program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michaels Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lehana ThabaneDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Department of Pediatrics and Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionManagement of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants is one of the most controversial topics in neonatal medicine. The availability of different pharmacotherapeutic options often poses a practical challenge to the practising neonatologist as to which one to choose as a therapeutic option. Our objectives are to determine the relative merits of the available pharmacotherapeutic options for the management of PDA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic review of all randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of intravenous or oral: indomethacin, ibuprofen and acetaminophen for the treatment of PDA in preterm infants. The primary outcome is failure of closure of the PDA. Secondary outcomes are neonatal mortality, need for surgical closure, duration of ventilator support, chronic lung disease, intraventricular haemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, necrotising enterocolitis, gastrointestinal bleeding, time to full enteral feeds and oliguria. We will search Medline, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) as well as grey literature resources. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, review full texts, extract information, and assess the risk of bias (ROB) and the confidence in the estimate (with Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach). Subgroup analysis according to gestational age, birth weight, different doses of interventions, time of administration of the first dose of the intervention, and echocardiographic definition of haemodynamically significant PDA and ROB are planned. We will perform a Bayesian network meta-analysis to combine the pooled direct and indirect treatment effect estimates for each outcome, if adequate data are available. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The results will help to reduce the uncertainty about the safety and effectiveness of the interventions, will identify knowledge gaps or will encourage further research for other therapeutic options. Therefore, its results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. On the basis of the nature of its design, no ethics approval is necessary for this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42015015797.

Indexed as

AcetaminophenAdministration, OralBayes TheoremCyclooxygenase InhibitorsDuctus Arteriosus, PatentHumansIbuprofenIndomethacinInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureNetwork Meta-Analysis as TopicPractice Guidelines as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSystematic Reviews as TopicAcetaminophenCyclooxygenase InhibitorsIbuprofenIndomethacinNEONATOLOGYPERINATOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID27456327
PMCPMC4964163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.