Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27456242›Full record

ArticleCytotechnology2016

Evaluation of Ceiba pentandra (L.) Gaertner bark extracts for in vitro cytotoxicity on cancer cells and in vivo antitumor activity in solid and liquid tumor models.

Ravishankar Kumar, Nitesh Kumar, Grandhi V Ramalingayya, Manganahalli Manjunath Setty, Karkala Sreedhara Rangnath Pai

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  4. Anti-Tumor Potential ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Antiulcerogenic Potential of the Ethanolic Extract ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ravishankar KumarDepartment of Pharmacology, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal University, Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, India.
Nitesh KumarDepartment of Pharmacology, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal University, Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, India.
Grandhi V RamalingayyaDepartment of Pharmacology, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal University, Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, India.
Manganahalli Manjunath SettyDepartment of Pharmacology, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal University, Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, India.
Karkala Sreedhara Rangnath PaiDepartment of Pharmacology, Manipal College of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Manipal University, Manipal, 576104, Karnataka, India. ksr.pai@manipal.edu.
Manipal Academy of Higher Education · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The stem bark of Ceiba pentandra (L.) Gaertner is claimed to be useful in the treatment of tumors in the southern part of India. This plant possesses a number of sesquiterpenoids and isoflavones which are known for their anticancer properties. The present study was designed to scientifically evaluate the cytotoxic potential of bark extracts in in vitro on Ehrlich ascites carcinoma (EAC), MCF-7 and B16F10 cells and in vivo in EAC (Liquid tumor) model and Dalton's lymphoma ascites (DLA or solid tumor) model. The bark was powdered and extracted successively with solvents viz., petroleum ether (PE), benzene, chloroform, acetone (AC), and ethyl alcohol in the sequential order of polarity. Cytotoxicity of dried extracts was screened on EAC cells by trypan blue assay. Three potent extracts namely petroleum ether, acetone, and ethanol were screened for their cytotoxicity on MCF-7 and B16F10 cells by MTT assay and nucleomorphological alteration by propidium iodide staining. Safe doses of these extracts were evaluated by acute toxicity study in mice. Extracts were found to be safe up to 300 mg/kg in acute toxicity study. Dosage of 1/10th and 1/20th of safe dose i.e., 15 and 30 mg/kg were selected for in vivo study. In the EAC model, both doses of the extracts showed a significant (P < 0.05) improvement in mean survival time and a maximum decline in tumor induced increase in body weight (an indirect measure of tumor weight) by the PE and AC treatment at 15 mg/kg compared to control. In the DLA-model, all extracts at both tested dose levels showed >50 % reduction in tumor weight and a significant reduction (P < 0.05) in tumor volume on the 30th day compared to control. It can be concluded that these extracts possess cytotoxic and antitumor activity.

Indexed as

AnticancerAntioxidantCeiba pentandra (L.) GaertnerDalton lymphoma ascitesEhrlich ascites carcinomaMTT assay

Identifiers

PMID27456242
PMCPMC5023570
OpenAlexW2479074833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.