Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27456229›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2016

Predictive value of vrk 1 and 2 for rectal adenocarcinoma response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: a retrospective observational cohort study.

Laura Del Puerto-Nevado, Juan Pablo Marin-Arango, Maria Jesus Fernandez-Aceñero, David Arroyo-Manzano, Javier Martinez-Useros, Aurea Borrero-Palacios, Maria Rodriguez-Remirez, Arancha Cebrian, Teresa Gomez Del Pulgar, Marlid Cruz-Ramos and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Molecular neuropsychiatry · 2018
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura Del Puerto-NevadoTranslational Oncology Division, Oncohealth Institute, Health Research Institute FJD-UAM, University Hospital "Fundacion Jimenez Diaz", Avenida Reyes Catolicos, 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Juan Pablo Marin-ArangoRadiotherapy Department, Oncohealth Institute, Health Research Institute FJD-UAM, University Hospital "Fundacion Jimenez Diaz", Avda Reyes Catolicos, 2, Madrid, 28040, Spain.
Maria Jesus Fernandez-AceñeroPathology Department, Oncohealth Institute, Health Research Institute FJD-UAM, University Hospital "Fundacion Jimenez Diaz", Avenida Reyes Catolicos, 2, Madrid, 28040, Spain.
David Arroyo-ManzanoClinical Biostatistics Unit, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Carretera de Colmenar Viejo km. 9,100, 28034 Madrid, Spain and CIBER of Epidemiology and Public Health (CIBERESP), C/Melchor Fernández Almagro, 3-5, Madrid, Spain.
Javier Martinez-UserosTranslational Oncology Division, Oncohealth Institute, Health Research Institute FJD-UAM, University Hospital "Fundacion Jimenez Diaz", Avenida Reyes Catolicos, 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Aurea Borrero-PalaciosTranslational Oncology Division, Oncohealth Institute, Health Research Institute FJD-UAM, University Hospital "Fundacion Jimenez Diaz", Avenida Reyes Catolicos, 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Maria Rodriguez-RemirezTranslational Oncology Division, Oncohealth Institute, Health Research Institute FJD-UAM, University Hospital "Fundacion Jimenez Diaz", Avenida Reyes Catolicos, 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Arancha CebrianTranslational Oncology Division, Oncohealth Institute, Health Research Institute FJD-UAM, University Hospital "Fundacion Jimenez Diaz", Avenida Reyes Catolicos, 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Teresa Gomez Del PulgarTranslational Oncology Division, Oncohealth Institute, Health Research Institute FJD-UAM, University Hospital "Fundacion Jimenez Diaz", Avenida Reyes Catolicos, 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Marlid Cruz-RamosTranslational Oncology Division, Oncohealth Institute, Health Research Institute FJD-UAM, University Hospital "Fundacion Jimenez Diaz", Avenida Reyes Catolicos, 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina CaramesTranslational Oncology Division, Oncohealth Institute, Health Research Institute FJD-UAM, University Hospital "Fundacion Jimenez Diaz", Avenida Reyes Catolicos, 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
Begoña Lopez-BotetRadiotherapy Department, Oncohealth Institute, Health Research Institute FJD-UAM, University Hospital "Fundacion Jimenez Diaz", Avda Reyes Catolicos, 2, Madrid, 28040, Spain.
Jesús Garcia-FoncillasTranslational Oncology Division, Oncohealth Institute, Health Research Institute FJD-UAM, University Hospital "Fundacion Jimenez Diaz", Avenida Reyes Catolicos, 2, 28040, Madrid, Spain. jesus.garciafoncillas@oncohealth.eu.
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESInstituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) followed by surgical resection is the standard therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. However, tumor response following NACRT varies, ranging from pathologic complete response to disease progression. We evaluated the kinases VRK1 and VRK2, which are known to play multiple roles in cellular proliferation, cell cycle regulation, and carcinogenesis, and as such are potential predictors of tumor response and may aid in identifying patients who could benefit from NACRT.

methodsSixty-seven pretreatment biopsies were examined for VRK1 and VRK2 expression using tissue microarrays. VRK1 and VRK2 Histoscores were combined by linear addition, resulting in a new variable designated as "composite score", and the statistical significance of this variable was assessed by univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test and area under the ROC curve (AUC) analysis were carried out to evaluate calibration and discrimination, respectively. A nomogram was also developed.

resultsUnivariate logistic regression showed that tumor size as well as composite score were statistically significant. Both variables remained significant in the multivariate analysis, obtaining an OR for tumor size of 0.65 (95 % CI, 0.45-0.94; p = 0.021) and composite score of 1.24 (95 % CI, 1.07-1.48; p = 0.005). Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed an adequate model calibration (p = 0.630) and good discrimination was also achieved, AUC 0.79 (95 % CI, 0.68-0.90).

conclusionsThis study provides novel data on the role of VRK1 and VRK2 in predicting tumor response to NACRT, and we propose a model with high predictive ability which could have a substantial impact on clinical management of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAgedArea Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorChemoradiotherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoadjuvant TherapyProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesRectal NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesVRK1 protein, humanVRK2 protein, humanChemoradiotherapyComposite scoreNACRTNomogramRectal cancerTumor responseVRK1VRK2

Identifiers

PMID27456229
PMCPMC4960836
OpenAlexW2480756521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.