Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27456210›Full record

ArticleThe patient2017

Item Reduction, Scoring, and First Validation of the ACCEPTance by the Patients of their Treatment (ACCEPT©) Questionnaire.

Benoit Arnould, Hélène Gilet, Donald L Patrick, Catherine Acquadro

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06072443 (AURORA Study-A Transformative Approach Utilizing Behavioral Economics, Education, and Data Science to Support Patients Initiating PrEP With Retention-in-care and Medication Persistence), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06072443 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

AURORA Study-A Transformative Approach Utilizing Behavioral Economics, Education, and Data Science to Support Patients Initiating PrEP With Retention-in-care and Medication Persistence

TypeobservationalSponsorWV Health Right, Inc.Ran2023 to 2025Enrolled105ConditionsHIV InfectionsArmsDigital Health Companion (mobile App)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Benoit ArnouldPatient-Centered Outcomes, Mapi, Lyon, France.
Hélène GiletPatient-Centered Outcomes, Mapi, Lyon, France.
Donald L PatrickSeattle Quality of Life Group and Biobehavioral Cancer Prevention and Training Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Catherine AcquadroMapi Research Trust, 27 rue de la Villette, 69003, Lyon, France. cacquadro@mapigroup.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe objectives of this study were to finalize, develop the scoring, and explore the psychometric properties of the ACCEPTance by the Patients of their Treatment (ACCEPT©) questionnaire, as well as to provide the first elements for its interpretation and guidance for its future use.

methodsACCEPT© was finalized according to reference methods including testing in a pilot study, i.e., a multi-center, observational, longitudinal study conducted in France, in collaboration with a network of pharmacists. Principal component analysis using Varimax rotation was performed. The loadings of items on components in the principal component analysis were used to inform item selection. Validity of the measurement model of ACCEPT© was confirmed using Multi-trait/Multi-item Analysis based on item-scale Spearman correlations. Internal consistency reliability of the questionnaire was assessed by determining the Cronbach's α coefficient. Linear and logistic regressions were used to identify predictors of general acceptance, and to study predictors of persistence.

resultsA total of 189 patients were included. The final version of ACCEPT© is composed of 25 items, distributed in seven dimensions providing a comprehensive appraisal of acceptance of long-term medication, with six scores measuring acceptance of treatment specific attributes and one score measuring general treatment acceptance. The measurement properties of ACCEPT© were overall fairly satisfactory. Regressions showed that Acceptance/Effectiveness is a predictor of general acceptance. However, no predictor of persistence could be identified.

conclusionThe self-administered ACCEPT© questionnaire is a valid and reliable instrument for the assessment of patients' acceptance of long-term medication. Disease-specific and large prospective studies are needed to assess the ability of ACCEPT

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.